Reply With Quote
What the does that have to do with anything?
No chance. GOP governor in MA.
What the does that have to do with anything?
It means governor gets to appoint a senator in her stead.
Fair point; but the real reason is she'd be a liability.
Even only four or five months of a Republican in that seat isn't worth Warren as VP.
you didn't know any of this.
Even only four or five months of a Republican in that seat isn't worth Warren as VP.
Four months of a Repub
That's when cabinet members are confirmed by the Senate and there's no guarantee of victory in a special election. This happened in Massachusetts when Ted Kennedy died during Obama's first term.
Cabinet confirmations are largely rubber stamping.That's when cabinet members are confirmed by the Senate and there's no guarantee of victory in a special election. This happened in Massachusetts when Ted Kennedy died during Obama's first term.
Except when they're not.
Quote it.
Yup. You're spouting Pocahontas excuse talking points.
You were given a chance to say you're against it.
You didn't take it.
You're free to say you're against doxxing.
I'll give you another chance.
Are you against doxxing people on this board?
Yes or no.
No reason to choose her as VP.Yup. You're spouting Pocahontas excuse talking points.
You agree with me.
Doxxing is fair game to the guy now too?Except when they're not.
Then again, the guy is ok with telling people to kill themselves in the most twisted of ways so doxxing is like a cake walk.
Yep, he will never say he's against doxxing and he keeps using the name other people did when they tried to dox me.
He really likes doxxing and will do nothing to dispute that claim.
I do agree with you on that overarching point.No reason to choose her as VP.
You agree with me.
Compulsive Chump
I'm against doxxing, David.
Speaking of chances, you had a chance to speak out against Snitch Factor. You voted present.
Why do you keep using the name others used when they tried top dox me?
You're really for that doxxing attempt. You show it every time you use that name.
Oh, are you now claiming that calling you David is doxxing you?
I'm saying you approve of doxxing attempts because you're using the name from one of them.
Do you approve of the doxxing attempt that got the name David?
Yes or no.
You claim you're not David. It can't be doxxing if it's not you.
But if you say it bothers you I'll grant you the courtesy of not calling you that.
Do you approve of the doxxing attempt that got the name David?
Yes or no.
How can you be against doxxing and then call him by that name? Even if that’s not really his name, you’re going along with the false idea he is this man.
He's gonna try to change the subject now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions