called it
the tinfoil hatters that will keep believing it is manmade
yes they are saying Wuhan Lab accidentally let a never before seen virus which was non manmade out of their lab
You said it was a US-Israeli produced virus along with The Great Bloated Plot?called it
yes they are saying Wuhan Lab accidentally let a never before seen virus which was non manmade out of their lab
What happened in your thinking?
that was TGY? maybe
I said there are rumors of some shady going at For Detrick MD and some strange respiratory illness in US last Nov but I did not say I believed that to be the case of Coronavirus
Urinegarden the urine has gone to ya head
You are the ultimate tin foil hat buddy.that was TGY? maybe
I said there are rumors of some shady going at For Detrick MD and some strange respiratory illness in US last Nov but I did not say I believed that to be the case of Coronavirus
Urinegarden the urine has gone to ya head
You and the Tattered Junker are some of the best and brightest at wearing colanders on you head.
Q: Did the virus come from a Wuhan lab?
A: It's not manmade
Q: Yeah but did it come from a Wuhan lab?
A: It's not manmade
So you are thinking a lab possibly had it from a natural source and was running experiments on it?
a highly contagious virus that happened naturally somehow evaded population and ended up in a lab and was accidentally let escape
yeah that is highy possible
or how about this one
a novel highly contagious respiratory virus that would go on to infect and kill millions happened to be born naturally in a wuhan lab animal
I think that is quite likely since that is exactly what they were researching.
or was already in an animal they collected.or how about this one
a novel highly contagious respiratory virus that would go on to infect and kill millions happened to be born naturally in a wuhan lab animal
so out of the hundreds of millions of animals in the wild they happened to somehow collect
one with a novel virus that would kill millions right?
Weren't they studying bats though while epidemiologists are saying this almost certainly jumped from a bat to another animal (thought to be a pangolin most likely) before going to humans? As much as I hate China's government and don't trust anything they say, birth at that wet market that they let exist even after another one created SARS-1 still seems like the most likely explanation.
Who knows what they did or didn't have in that lab? China sure isn't gonna tell us. We do know they were experimenting with corona viruses.
so do we and dozen other countries
still. the premise that things unfolded as told by the script of the movie Outbreak should give us pause and tell us to stop this madness
Please read this and tell me what you think.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-coronavirus1/
How do we know what was in that lab? You apparently have a lot more faith in the Chinese govt. than I do.
Please read the whole thing.
That jump from bat to pangolin (or some other mammal) seems really hard to see as a lab accident though. Can't really see an infectious disease lab storing live animals the same way a wet market would. China reopening their wet markets after they created the first SARS is reason enough to hate the CCP.
I know what was NOT in that lab. A naturally occurring never detected respiratory virus that would kill millions
I dont need to have faith in any government. just faith in logic and laws of probability
Again.
People should read this.
Interesting read. Thanks. She says she was afraid it came from the lab but couldn't find a match. If she thought it could have come from the lab then it wasn't unreasonable to suspect it.
Until you get to the end and realize all the different coronavirus sequences in different parts of the world that live close to people and Mammals. And until she put together the village scenario with SARS and covid before she had it in her lab.
My interpretation is yes she was scared. But as she got more info from others its pretty clear these viruses are all over crowded places that people have moved closer to some mammal populations and that this will happen again, lab or not. Its produced in the wild and its most likely the one we experienced now was already spreading "naturally".
But I think this scientist getting irrationally crucified is ridiculous.
And thanks for reading, as I know that 90% of the board would not touch it and rather put up a tweet of a tweet than read something written for fairly educated laymen about science.
The animal died (likely a dog) and someone ate it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
