Abe Lincoln went bankrupt twice---getting away with pennies on the dollar.
A little over 20 years ago, SCTUS ruled that Bill Clinton had to participate persoally in civil discovery, today Trump is arguing that he has the power to stop discovery while he's in office. How doea that strike you?
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-12-2020 at 10:29 AM.
Yep, that's the trough we're in & have been for decades.
You use the courts like a pro. WTF do you think we learned that trick from? You just like to dish it. You don't want to take it.
It's human.
they are arguing to stop his records coming out from BEFORE he was president
so this is for private citizen trump
but they are using the presidency to defend private citizen trump from being held to the same standard as any other citizen
picky, gettin' his talking points & marching orders straight from MSM.
GO---PICKY---GO!!!
Oh, I get it, in & out of gov't we use the judicial system to thwart the judicial system. When Trump wants to do it, you throw up the stop sign.
No. What's good for the good is sauce for the gander.
See that light, Ruth? Go toward it.
You're GD right. You started (whataboutery!) figuring we'd not follow in.
Uh, uh. You grew it, you chew it.
This ing Atty (Letter) plain sucks
question after question from scotus - basically asking him (how can we go forward without harassing poor widdle twump from harassment?
Atty letter just weakly citing “legislative” reasons
i dont see why he wont go on offense and say- “national security - Mueller stated that trum team welcomed russias advances- Congress needs to know if those advances included financial incentives- this is about protecting the country from foreign intervention and possible other high crimes”
he sucks
Yup this bumbling got the bed
pretty sure trump keeps taxes hidden
next case re; ny da investigation/pres immunity
Last edited by Spurs Homer; 05-12-2020 at 10:59 AM.
Threadbare gonna be so sorry when Trash loses and the next unrestrained king is a liberal dem. What’s good for the goose ... yada, yada, yada
Repugs will abandon "unitary executive" when a Dem is President, and apply maximum oversight of the Exec branch
This attorney for NY sounds a whole lot more competent
he has hit on a ton of aggressive points and had aggressively pushed back on this “overly protecting a president from undue burden”
by pointing out the nixon and clinton cases and how those decisions did not cause a
“flood of frivolous politically motivated cases against the president”
Just like you guys do the other way.
Old as time, bouts.
...absolutely. We learned the "goose" from you guys. If you win it'll be your turn. If you don't we'll keep cleanin' the plow for another 4 years.
Repugs tried to out Clinton for a BJ. Dems looking to show Trash is in Pootin’s pocket which is pretty obvious from Trash’s actions.
Your reply is like the Charlie Manson parlor trick of saying he's what society sees when it looks in the mirror.
It wasn't a trick, it was the painful truth---that's why you ain't forgotten it half-a-century on.
Both used the tools that came available.
This did not go too well for President Orange.
Hope for more of what went down today.
Trump doesn't know .5d chess.
He knew enough to be 45, forever...just like the 44 before him.Trump doesn't know .
disagree
knowing the disgusting state of affairs
this will just result in more delays til after november
cant see that his financials will be released before then
and that is basically trumps plan
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote