1. #49951
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,867
    you think those are all guilty pleas?

    a total of 41 of their cases are guilty pleas. 343 of them are not.
    TSA's concern about coercive pleading appears to be situational, not ethical or merciful.

  2. #49952
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908

  3. #49953
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    You’re wrong on the investigation aspect and materiality. The original investigation into Flynn being an agent of Russia, as flimsy as it was based on do ented but unknown lies to the FBI at that time from a CHS, would be considered properly predicated. That investigation was closed after 5 months of no derogatory information showing up with the electronic communication being filed. With the Flynn/Kislyak calls the FBI was going after the laughable never been prosecuted Logan Act. In order for the new investigation into the Logan Act to be properly predicated the FBI would have needed to file another electronic communication stating they are now investigating per the Logan Act, and they didn’t.

    It doesn’t matter if guys like Comey and McCabe think they were justified based on their feelings, the law is the only thing that matters. They didn’t follow the law, end of story.
    So you're saying everybody is lying except the guy that admitted to lying?

    We covered this already, at least one judge had to decide on materiality in the case and sided with the FBI. I have no reason to believe that judge was lying. The evidence that judge was lied to is simply unconvincing. If the material presented to dismiss the case would've been presented to the judge for him to make a determination, and the judge decided that indeed that was the case, then I think nobody would be talking about Barr's corruption in this particular move, IMO.


    These guys all admitted to crimes they never committed too...must be because they actually committed them and not because they were threatened with harsh punishment unless they pled amirite?

    https://www.innocenceproject.org/
    But they didn't plead guilty to committing them. Then it becomes the burden of prosecution to prove the case. That's why I said I would've liked the courts to decide this particular case, since the prosecution already won it.

    At the end of the day, that's exactly how justice works.

  4. #49954
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Mueller never ran that team and was nothing but a face to give it legitimacy. His testimony was embarrassing and he looked like a slightly more coherent Biden. The case against the Russian troll farm was dismissed by the judge and the case against Flynn’s business partner was overturned
    I'm pretty sure Mueller ran that team and he put his neck on the line with the report. I also think it's likely not the last we've heard of said report, but time will tell.

  5. #49955
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    TSA's concern about coercive pleading appears to be situational, not ethical or merciful.
    Of course... don't have to be Nostradamus to hear the crying when the next Dem AG pulls a similar stunt...

  6. #49956
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,867
    Of course... don't have to be Nostradamus to hear the crying when the next Dem AG pulls a similar stunt...
    So whiny in his epigonism of the great man. Only the great man himself is whinier than his epigones in these pages.

  7. #49957
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    It was going to be a waste of government resources for people who’d never be extradited.

    Still waiting for an answer.

    It appears Sullivan ed up. Do you disagree, or are you even knowledgeable enough to dispute anything I posted from a much more experienced federal prosecutor than whatever stage you’re at now?

    Sullivan bad now looks like a white flag from here.

  8. #49958
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    And they slurped it up every single time, minus spurraider who mocked Schiff’s “memo”.

  9. #49959
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    I think this is fairly new.

    A U.S. judge put on hold the Justice Department’s move to drop charges against Michael Flynn, saying he expects independent groups and legal experts to argue against the bid to exonerate President Trump’s former national security adviser of lying to the FBI.
    U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said in an order Tuesday that he expects individuals and organizations will seek to intervene in the politically charged case. Having others weigh in could preface more aggressive steps that the federal judge in Washington could take, including — as many outside observers have called for — holding a hearing to consider what to do.
    Sullivan’s order came after the government took the highly irregular step Thursday of reversing its stance on upholding Flynn’s guilty plea.


    And I don’t understand how significant it is because the reversal from the DOJ was so bizarre.
    Sorry If Its already been posted.

    From WaPo

  10. #49960
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    So you're saying everybody is lying except the guy that admitted to lying?

    We covered this already, at least one judge had to decide on materiality in the case and sided with the FBI. I have no reason to believe that judge was lying. The evidence that judge was lied to is simply unconvincing. If the material presented to dismiss the case would've been presented to the judge for him to make a determination, and the judge decided that indeed that was the case, then I think nobody would be talking about Barr's corruption in this particular move, IMO.




    But they didn't plead guilty to committing them. Then it becomes the burden of prosecution to prove the case. That's why I said I would've liked the courts to decide this particular case, since the prosecution already won it.

    At the end of the day, that's exactly how justice works.
    I never claimed Sullivan lied. I claimed and have shown the lead prosecutor lied to him.

    You consider it a win when the prosecutor hides evidence from the judge?

  11. #49961
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    It was going to be a waste of government resources for people who’d never be extradited.

    Still waiting for an answer.

    It appears Sullivan ed up. Do you disagree, or are you even knowledgeable enough to dispute anything I posted from a much more experienced federal prosecutor than whatever stage you’re at now?

    Sullivan bad now looks like a white flag from here.
    its hard to acknowledge that sullivan ed up given that we dont have any ruling to that effect, just the DOJ waiving the white flag at the direction of Barr

    so when you say the judge dismissed the case (every dismissal is done by a judge), who asked for the dismissal?

  12. #49962
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    its hard to acknowledge that sullivan ed up given that we dont have any ruling to that effect, just the DOJ waiving the white flag at the direction of Barr

    so when you say the judge dismissed the case (every dismissal is done by a judge), who asked for the dismissal?
    Judge...DOJ...was going off memory and doesn’t matter either way, was going to be a waste of gov resources.


    “Judge Sullivan entered judgment on a guilty plea without first finding that a factual basis existed. That violated the requirements of Rule 11, and makes the guilty plea unsound.”

    Agree or disagree? If disagree why?

  13. #49963
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    I think this is fairly new.

    A U.S. judge put on hold the Justice Department’s move to drop charges against Michael Flynn, saying he expects independent groups and legal experts to argue against the bid to exonerate President Trump’s former national security adviser of lying to the FBI.
    U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said in an order Tuesday that he expects individuals and organizations will seek to intervene in the politically charged case. Having others weigh in could preface more aggressive steps that the federal judge in Washington could take, including — as many outside observers have called for — holding a hearing to consider what to do.
    Sullivan’s order came after the government took the highly irregular step Thursday of reversing its stance on upholding Flynn’s guilty plea.


    And I don’t understand how significant it is because the reversal from the DOJ was so bizarre.
    Sorry If Its already been posted.

    From WaPo

  14. #49964
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    lol I see why Judge Sullivan bad now... he's going to let outside counsel argue against the DOJ motion...

  15. #49965
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596


    The Unraveling Part...?

  16. #49966
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Flynn is innocent because of a series of timing technicalities?


  17. #49967
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    “Judge Sullivan entered judgment on a guilty plea without first finding that a factual basis existed. That violated the requirements of Rule 11, and makes the guilty plea unsound.”
    I think that's a sound argument that could've been brought up in appeals. That's basically how the judicial works. It doesn't nullify the entire trial unless a higher instance says it does.

  18. #49968
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Judge...DOJ...was going off memory and doesn’t matter either way, was going to be a waste of gov resources.


    “Judge Sullivan entered judgment on a guilty plea without first finding that a factual basis existed. That violated the requirements of Rule 11, and makes the guilty plea unsound.”

    Agree or disagree? If disagree why?
    i dont know that a factual basis didnt exist. there are transcripts of his calls with kislyak, and notes reflecting what he told the Feds, during an ongoing investigation.

    i'm not saying that i know or believe for a fact that it was all kosher, but i dont have much reason to believe it wasnt, other than the DOJ's curious recent change in tune. would have loved to have a ruling or judicial opinion on the matter

  19. #49969
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    yah, I don't think the lying to agents is disputed here... not even by the DOJ

  20. #49970
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    i dont know that a factual basis didnt exist. there are transcripts of his calls with kislyak, and notes reflecting what he told the Feds, during an ongoing investigation.

    i'm not saying that i know or believe for a fact that it was all kosher, but i dont have much reason to believe it wasnt, other than the DOJ's curious recent change in tune. would have loved to have a ruling or judicial opinion on the matter


    Those pesky notes

    "What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"

  21. #49971
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Those pesky notes

    "What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"
    Doesn't matter what their goal was.

    Flynn lied to them all on his own.

    Those pesky lies.

  22. #49972
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Those pesky notes

    "What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"
    Still don't get what's wrong with that particular note, tbh

  23. #49973
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Doesn't matter what their goal was.

    Flynn lied to them all on his own.

    Those pesky lies.

    Don't know why you're so invested in Flynn getting screwed.

  24. #49974
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Still don't get what's wrong with that particular note, tbh
    Really?

  25. #49975
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Well it looks like Sullivan was not pleased so the invitation has been given.

    You get to continue sailing through the storm.
    Godspeed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •