Great. Stop those too.
That won't stop all the pandemics in the future.
And it does nothing to the virus already here.
Because the virus is here.
Now.
Do you understand that?
Great. Stop those too.
That won't stop all the pandemics in the future.
And it does nothing to the virus already here.
But that is reactionary. No wet market. No current virus. No need for mask. But you want me to stay in my NYC apartment, wear a mask, so I can "save" you, but you still have operational wet markets? Presidents fault
but just like wearing masks and staying home its not about eradication, its about eliminating unnecessary risk. And you agree that these viruses are transmission via animals to humans due to hygienic errors as well as wet markets being a leading cause of this.
It didn't start in NYC.
It is more of a risk to have operational wet markets than to not wear a mask.
Strawman. It started in a wet market.
Lololol and you said wet markets were only in China.
I don't have percentages and I bet you don't either.
I'm fine with shutting down every wet market in the world. It won't eradicate pandemics and does nothing for the virus that's already here.
I said we can't control the wet markets in China. No need to lie about what I said.
You don't even know what goes on in your own country and you blaming leaders. Say what
No, I purposely asked about now.
testing is difficult, but why? Why is it so hard to get an affordable and accurate test? Why is there such a high margin of error?
Antibdy tests could help supplement , but they are not completely specific to 19?
Bottom line is, you would like to find out how many have or have had it and learn about why there are “hot spots”?
that it in a nuts ?
That wasn't the argument. The argument was and still is that wet markets are an unnecessary risk. And refusing to shut them down only adds to the risk of future pandemics.
The wet markets where this virus came from are in China. I'm fine with shutting down every wet market in the world. It won't eradicate pandemics.
I'm not refusing to shut them down. Theoretically, Trump could shut them down right now so I will blame him for that if you need me to.
Right, but that wasn't the argument. The argument was that masks and social distancing are reactions to problems caused by wet markets. If you want others to wear a mask and social distance, TO MITIGATE RISK, then you should also mitigate risk by eliminating wet markets.
FAILED LEADERSHIP BY NYC GOVT
No its a state thing. Not a trump thing. So blame trump, cdc and goverror of ny. They are all not addressing the issue.
See how that works. Not one person problem
now if you really want to get to the bottom of the issue, cdc has not addressed obesity during this whole thing. Wonder why.??
Trump could stop that right now so you can blame him too.
But you're talking about theoretical outbreaks. I guess you have to.
No, that's not the real bottom of the issue. The real issue is there is currently a deadly virus spreading in the US.
He cannot stop that. It is a state issue. But why wouldn't the governor of NY want to address this?
Deadly to a very specific group of people.
FDA. Commerce. USDA. Plenty of ways to go about it.
But it means nothing for the current pandemic.
Not really. You're going off on another tangent now. It's 87,000 Americans.
Strawman. Its about mitigating risk. You blame him for not being prepared. State govt allowing more risk to future health outbreaks. Ny gov doing nothing. Wrong about the 140k beds. Putting people at risk. Shame.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)