Not at all. Google decided he was the enemy of the people and shined that spotlight right on him.
After you looked him up and found out he shat on your masters' plandemic.
Not at all. Google decided he was the enemy of the people and shined that spotlight right on him.
I didn't even look up what he said. What does he say about your conspiracy theory that you are afraid to talk about?
But he does confirm your bias.
I looked up an interview with this guy. He claims South Korea didn't do anything and the pandemic just ended on its own in three weeks.
My bias is freedom. Yours is subjugation. I'll live with that.
Nah, your bias isn't freedom at all.
But tell me, what is Wittkowski's current projection for cases and deaths through August?
I don't know. I can tell you the fake 2.2 million death model for which the shutdown was based upon.
BTW, the pseudo science behind that false model is not available to the people.
Enjoy the subjugation you craved, .
Do you guys know how much time you two have devoted to these useless slap fights? Just meet up and work it out.![]()
Oh, so he didn't even try?
Damn. Is he just lazy or what?
I asked you what coronavirus models you prefer as well.
I'll take lazy and harmless over stupid and catastrophic.
Meh, he's not even using his alleged expertise.
So says David Dook.
I like the models from epidemiologists who actually make models.
Which ones do you like?
Let's see them.
Hours and hours and hours of your life.
I'm having a pool party tomorrow. Small party, tho.
Do you have any other coronavirus models you like?
Yea, you especially liked the model that had 2.2 million people dying.
I like the non-re ed ones that doesn't call for everything to be shut down.
OK, where are the links to those?
I'd love to see their numbers.
UWA model seems fairly accurate
Thanks. Got a link to it?
Thank you lockdown.
I imagine Canada rewards freeloaders even more than the USA.
Oregon high court halts ruling nixing virus restrictions
https://apnews.com/13909d70c59188e32...7FWbYJMQ2LSi_k
Either you believed the original models, hence you agreed with all these restrictions, or you agreed with all the restrictions without doing any type of independent thinking regarding the models. Either way, it is safe to say, you were wrong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)