Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Spurs Fan
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    1,383
    It appears that an armed group of domestic criminal insurgents took over the community in Seattle. The Seattle Police Chief says that in this lawless zone, the terrorist insurgents are raping, stealing and extorting their homes, but they're not going to do anything about it.


    There is no government in that community. There's no mayor. No central police force. There is no state police. There's no governor. No FBI, no federal police, no. There's no president. There are no courts. It is a completely lawless zone that has been taken over by criminal terrorist insurgents.


    It would seem that this is one of the exact reasons that the US Cons ution provides for citizens' militias. In the American past, especially in remote regions, armed citizen militias have often been forced to fight criminal gangs taking over their community.


    Would you join an armed militia to protect your community when the government ceased to exist and criminal gangs took over and commit crimes as serious as rape if you were living in that community? Are you going to join with others to protect each other and your community in armed resistance?

  2. #2
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    20,700
    Everything about your premise only applies to urban areas so I can't really give an answer

    I know over the last 23 years there have been multiple occasions where my community has come together to help each other out. I know most everyone in my community is well armed. So I have no doubt the community would protect itself if it had to.

  4. #4
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    19,410
    In America, easier to pack up and move.

  5. #5
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    chumpdump is hiding in trumps bunker.

  6. #6
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,425
    thldren wandering around the forums looking to start a fight he lost in March.

  7. #7
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    An armed militia that protects it's own community sounds more appealing than relying on the government in it's current form.

    I would join.

  8. #8
    OH YOU LIKE IT!!! slick'81's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    18,493
    Im a lover not a fighter

  9. #9
    BLACK LIVES MATTER Play Boban's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,005
    Opie would join Raz’s militia tbh

  10. #10
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Dystopian movies

    Go watch mad max stuff

  11. #11
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,665
    It appears that an armed group of domestic criminal insurgents took over the community in Seattle. The Seattle Police Chief says that in this lawless zone, the terrorist insurgents are raping, stealing and extorting their homes, but they're not going to do anything about it.


    There is no government in that community. There's no mayor. No central police force. There is no state police. There's no governor. No FBI, no federal police, no. There's no president. There are no courts. It is a completely lawless zone that has been taken over by criminal terrorist insurgents.


    It would seem that this is one of the exact reasons that the US Cons ution provides for citizens' militias. In the American past, especially in remote regions, armed citizen militias have often been forced to fight criminal gangs taking over their community.


    Would you join an armed militia to protect your community when the government ceased to exist and criminal gangs took over and commit crimes as serious as rape if you were living in that community? Are you going to join with others to protect each other and your community in armed resistance?
    Do you have a link?

  12. #12
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105


    Stupid americans falling for scare mongering

  13. #13
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    12,591
    Im a militia of one.

  14. #14
    [email protected] David Hogg's Avatar
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Post Count
    468
    An armed militia that protects it's own community sounds more appealing than relying on the government in it's current form.

    I would join.
    Joining a militia would mean getting off your ass and doing something besides watching re ed conspiracy videos on youtube. So no, you wouldn’t.

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    12,071
    There were a couple of "protests" out in my little town.

    Aside from pharmacies and grocery stores, almost all the businesses are local-owned and we're not far from the lunacy of the Bay. (Dip s in San Jose were storming the freeway and removing people from their cars and beating them)

    The businesses chipped in and hired a militia to show up. It was advertised and published that they were just a preventive measure to keep the properties and residents safe. The police cosigned it as well.


    Nothing happened, but man, you'd think they went in everyone's home and pissed all over their mothers.

    It pissed off a lot of younger people in the area to see dudes with weapons in front of the businesses they were hired to protect. They antagonized no one and weren't walking around holding their weapons. They were just hired security.

    It was just dumbfounding to see so many people upset about something so mundane and having zero understanding for why they were there, despite it being spelled out clearly.

    People have a right to protest, but people also have a right to protect their property.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •