Reply With Quote
Case in point, your snowflake lacks any decorum.
Her actions are very politically correct in snowflake land.
BTW,at Chumpettes running for the hills on this one.
They just don't love Trump any more
You're still painfully unaware with the meaning of the term. It refers to having political positions that are considered politically safe but not necessarily good.
It's not about decorum whatsoever.
Case in point, your snowflake lacks any decorum.
Her actions are very politically correct in snowflake land.
BTW,
Why would we run for the hills?Case in point, your snowflake lacks any decorum.
Her actions are very politically correct in snowflake land.
BTW,
The rally was a bust. No one was prevented from entering.
I literally provided a link to the dictionary definition of it, and you're still arguing.You're still painfully unaware with the meaning of the term. It refers to having political positions that are considered politically safe but not necessarily good.
It's not about decorum whatsoever.
Words don't get to be whatever you want them to be.
I literally provided a link to the dictionary definition of it, and you're still arguing.
Words don't get to be whatever you want them to be.
That definition is partially correct. You've still been woefully misusing the term.I literally provided a link to the dictionary definition of it, and you're still arguing.
Words don't get to be whatever you want them to be.
lol partially... ok boomer
CherpDook wants to be spoon fed stuff he already knows. Par.
Indeed. What it presents is correct; but the definition is by no means that limited in scope.
derp folds.
No one ran.
Sabotaging political opponents good now.
Sabotaging political opponents good now.
That simply didn't happen.
No one was kept out of the arena. All 62
You need to re-read how the sabotage occurred.
That simply didn't happen.
No one was kept out of the arena. All 62
Or maybe just read it for the first time.
You're embarrassing yourself right now.
It's bad. I refrain from laughing out of pity.
What, the reservations?
That didn't keep one person from entering the arena.
We talked about this, tbh, Trump is just not very popular, never was, even more so now that he's been 4 years on the job.
On top of that his demographic largely falls squarely on the boomers, and as stupid he thinks they are, they're not going to die for him over a campaign rally, IMO.
We'll see how this progresses in other cities.
The Chile flashbacks keep coming! The kpop mafia is a powerful enemy
If you go to a rally, you're already on board. It's a pointless spectacle of autofeltching.
People didn't show up because they figured they wouldn't get a seat.
This isn't hard to get, cherp.
62
I can definitely say I was telling you this before less than 6200 peeps showed up to see him, in a state he won easily and probably polls absolutely great for him...
I also did tell you back then the 30% should be enough to fill any arena, tbh, but the covid is a problem...
62
??? sabotage?
Thinking 800,000 people were actually going to Tulsa.
Would've been a packed house if not for the shenanigans. Stop comforting yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions