"Muh Sweden."

[midnightpulp]

Parameter Values that vary among the five COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios. The scenarios are intended to advance public health preparedness and planning. They are not predictions or estimates of the expected impact of COVID-19.

CDC estimate no good now

And yeah, I agree. The IFR in the US might be higher considering the average American's health

[tholdren]

yes I did, remember you kept saying that it wasn't 2x flu, then cdc said it was actually a little less than 2x flu?

This was after I repeatedly told.you if you're not 70 and or have a preexisting health condition you will be fine. Then you said everyone was high risk.

Then I said just wash your hands and maintain good hygienic practices and you ridiculed that, but now you are going on an on about nordic countries who say the exact same thing.

This has been terrible for you

from the same report you cited
The risk to students of reopening schools is quite small. For instance, more young adults aged 15-24 will drown than die from coronavirus.

Ifr for under 65 is significantly less than the flu per your study 65 plus the ifr is carrying the weight this will decrease and already has based on cases currently being reported.

Thanks for continuing to prove my point

[ChumpDumper]

from the same report you cited
The risk to students of reopening schools is quite small. For instance, more young adults aged 15-24 will drown than die from coronavirus.

Ifr for under 65 is significantly less than the flu per your study 65 plus the ifr is carrying the weight this will decrease and already has based on cases currently being reported.

Thanks for continuing to prove my point

Thanks for folding when I called you out.

Nice weasel move.

You are not smart.

[tholdren]

Thanks for folding when I called you out.

Nice weasel move.

You are not smart.

Not folding. Its science. At the current rate of cases ifr goes down steadily. .

[ChumpDumper]

Not folding. Its science. At the current rate of cases ifr goes down steadily. .

Show your math.

[tholdren]

Show your math.

It's the definition of ifr

[ChumpDumper]

It's the definition of ifr

You're not showing any math.

Not scientific.

Sad.

[tholdren]

You're not showing any math.

Not scientific.

Sad.

then you dont know how ifr is calculated which means you discussing rate of fatality = gossip.

Amirite

[ChumpDumper]

then you dont know how ifr is calculated which means you discussing rate of fatality = gossip.

Amirite

You're gossiping.

You're not showing any math.

You aren't doing any science.

You are not smart.

[tholdren]

LOL your link hasn't shown any deaths since July 10th. LOL no deaths from July 11th onwards. Man I'm sorry I ever took the time to actually check any stupid you posted. Back to the ignore list for you little boy.

Lol you cannot make this up.

Baseline bum every day posts daily death counts headlines.

Baseline bum now knows that these counts are not actually deaths that occurred that day

Baseline bum will continue to explain how daily death counts can be used to determine the severity of disease.


Lolololol

It doesn't get any better than this.

[ChumpDumper]

Lol you cannot make this up.

Baseline bum every day posts daily death counts headlines.

Baseline bum now knows that these counts are not actually deaths that occurred that day

Baseline bum will continue to explain how daily death counts can be used to determine the severity of disease.


Lolololol

It doesn't get any better than this.

How do you determine the severity of disease?

Show your math.

Thanks in advance for folding.

[baseline bum]

Lol you cannot make this up.

Baseline bum every day posts daily death counts headlines.

Baseline bum now knows that these counts are not actually deaths that occurred that day

Baseline bum will continue to explain how daily death counts can be used to determine the severity of disease.


Lolololol

It doesn't get any better than this.

So you're basically acknowledging the death count is an undercount.

[tholdren]

So you're basically acknowledging the death count is an undercount.

No it isn't. You are assuming all deaths covid probable or even listed as covid are actual covid deaths. These are not. Even with the deaths that happened today that will be attributed to covid i.e. probable or confirmed is not enough to detract from all cause fatality v covid related. But you will not understand that because you do not understand a prerequisite.

Covid is not even in epidemic range at this point.

[ChumpDumper]

No it isn't. You are assuming all deaths covid probable or even listed as covid are actual covid deaths. These are not. Even with the deaths that happened today that will be attributed to covid i.e. probable or confirmed is not enough to detract from all cause fatality v covid related. But you will not understand that because you do not understand a prerequisite.

Covid is not even in epidemic range at this point.

Prove it.

[baseline bum]

No it isn't. You are assuming all deaths covid probable or even listed as covid are actual covid deaths. These are not. Even with the deaths that happened today that will be attributed to covid i.e. probable or confirmed is not enough to detract from all cause fatality v covid related. But you will not understand that because you do not understand a prerequisite.

Covid is not even in epidemic range at this point.

LMAO counting only old deaths, so not counting new deaths isn't an undercount

COVID not an epidemic

[tholdren]

LMAO counting only old deaths, so not counting new deaths isn't an undercount

COVID not an epidemic

Ok go to cdc guidelines for definitions. Enjoy

[tholdren]

Ok go to cdc guidelines for definitions. Enjoy

But i forgot. You dont have time to research you only have time to gossip.

And yes the numbers you are citing are not even confirmed cases nor did these all reach fatality due to covid. All they had to have was an test that they had covid at some point in their life, a symptom, around someone who had a pos at some point or a symptom.

You should really look at the definitions of what you post before you proceed

[ChumpDumper]

www.theinternet.com

[baseline bum]

Ok go to cdc guidelines for definitions. Enjoy

140k motorcycle deaths called COVID

[tholdren]

no the cdc definition of pandemic epidemic and the thresholds that make those things reality.

[baseline bum]

It's an overcount and an undercount at the same time

[ChumpDumper]

no the cdc definition of pandemic epidemic and the thresholds that make those things reality.

You're gossiping.

Show your definitions and numbers.

[tholdren]

140k motorcycle deaths called COVID

You are the one citing those numbers as 100 percent accurate when you know that there are discrepancies in the data. So essentially you are just clarifying how you know the numbers you post are gossip.

[baseline bum]

You are the one citing those numbers as 100 percent accurate when you know that there are discrepancies in the data. So essentially you are just clarifying how you know the numbers you post are gossip.

Your discrepancies conspiracy theory is gossip. Glad you agree it's an undercount.

[tholdren]

Your discrepancies conspiracy theory is gossip. Glad you agree it's an undercount.

Nope proceed now that you admitted the numbers you're using aren't accurate. Quick. Also the houston site you had difficulty understanding will also tell you if the deaths were test confirmed. So you can use that too.