Study of 65,000 students in South Korea finds middle and high school children pass it virus as well as adults.

[midnightpulp]

[QUOTE=TSA;10199795]

So we're at an inconclusive crossroads then. Do you think it's wise to send students back to school wholesale where the consequences are inconclusive? We also still have no robust studies on the long term effects of getting infected. What if we created a generation of asthmatics?

[Blake]

Did you purposely leave off the very next sentence of the article you linked?

Yes, it wasn't necessary. We've been over this but you're just here to win the internets.

Do kids transmit covid the way adults do? No

Do kids still transmit it? Yes.

It's very simple but you're gonna screech about wanting studies showing kids being mega vectors now.

[Blake]

no you didn't. If you would have read the Twitter thread he says the same thing you had to Google to.find.

Take a math or statistics class. Or even a philosophy class. Your logic is awful

But you're a confirmed liar and idiot tho.

[Blake]

[QUOTE=midnightpulp;10199885]

So we're at an inconclusive crossroads then. Do you think it's wise to send students back to school wholesale where the consequences are inconclusive? We also still have no robust studies on the long term effects of getting infected. What if we created a generation of asthmatics?

BUT SWEDEN SAYS IT'S OKAY

[tholdren]

[QUOTE=Blake;10199891]

BUT SWEDEN SAYS IT'S OKAY

Right. And they have had no lockdown and school continued. They would probably be the best to judge. Go look at their data. Its not the working class or students who are dying.

[pgardn]

[QUOTE=midnightpulp;10199885]

So we're at an inconclusive crossroads then. Do you think it's wise to send students back to school wholesale where the consequences are inconclusive? We also still have no robust studies on the long term effects of getting infected. What if we created a generation of asthmatics?

Why did this pediatric research reviewer not get his stuff to SK?
If his claim is legit and important he should have corresponded with this research group. If he is known as top notch, he would have or even if he had concerns as a relative unknown to them, he could have got it through to someone with more clout.
Did he? why not? why did they not read his criticism? too much missing here. He had access to the data he says was left out, explain. He was on this way early in the game.

This requires more info, its not how something this important should work.

[tholdren]

[QUOTE=pgardn;10199914]

Why did this pediatric research reviewer not get his stuff to SK?
If his claim is legit and important he should have corresponded with this research group. If he is known as top notch, he would have or even if he had concerns as a relative unknown to them, he could have got it through to someone with more clout.
Did he? why not? why did they not read his criticism? too much missing here. He had access to the data he says was left out, explain. He was on this way early in the game.

This requires more info, its not how something this important should work.

its how every study works.

[pgardn]

[QUOTE=tholdren;10199918]

its how every study works.

Absolutely wrong.

If the reviewer is correct and had the complaints early on, it would be in the SK published study.
I can see this happening in some obscure journal that no one reviews thoroughly, but not a good reviewer that had the "data that was left out"
He rings the bell early in his Southampton group, not just on twitter for TSA and you.

[pgardn]

Find it.

[tholdren]

[QUOTE=pgardn;10199924]

Absolutely wrong.

If the reviewer is correct and had the complaints early on, it would be in the SK published study.
I can see this happening in some obscure journal that no one reviews thoroughly, but not a good reviewer that had the "data that was left out"
He rings the bell early in his Southampton group, not just on twitter for TSA and you.

no, every study has strength weakness and future study. It is science. It is how science works

[pgardn]

[QUOTE=tholdren;10199928]

no, every study has strength weakness and future study. It is science. It is how science works

Can you not read?

This REVIEWER had data that was "left out" early on.
Why did he not do his job? what happened?

[tholdren]

[QUOTE=pgardn;10199943]

Can you not read?

This REVIEWER had data that was "left out" early on.
Why did he not do his job? what happened?

Don't you ubderstand the process? Every datum not included in every study.

[pgardn]

[QUOTE=tholdren;10199947]

Don't you ubderstand the process? Every datum not included in every study.

He is a research REVIEWER and reviewed had access early on and did not tell the authors?
Why not?

Find it. Why not?

This is very important in determining how different countries should go about opening schools.
But he tweets TSA and you? You dont put this stuff out if a REVIEWER has a salient objection.
Im not even saying I dont believe it, what I dont get is the process, it does not work like this on something this important.

And if it does, it needs to be corrected so find out why.
You wont.

[tholdren]

[QUOTE=pgardn;10199957]

He is a research REVIEWER and reviewed had access early on and did not tell the authors?
Why not?

Find it. Why not?

This is very important in determining how different countries should go about opening schools.
But he tweets TSA and you? You dont put this stuff out if a REVIEWER has a salient objection.
Im not even saying I dont believe it, what I dont get is the process, it does not work like this on something this important.

And if it does, it needs to be corrected so find out why.
You wont.

You dont know what the committee said or did

[pgardn]

[QUOTE=tholdren;10199959]

You dont know what the committee said or did

Exactly.
Find it since you do.

You dont even know if any committee ever even saw the complaint before twitter.
Find it.

[tholdren]

[QUOTE=pgardn;10199970]

Exactly.
Find it since you do.

You dont even know if any committee ever even saw the complaint before twitter.
Find it.

Then you admit you don't understand. White flag for gossip accepted

[pgardn]

[QUOTE=tholdren;10199974]

Then you admit you don't understand. White flag for gossip accepted

Yes I admit that you admit you dont know and cant find anything.
You are an old man who does not understand science in its current state or math.
There is nothing this board can do for you.
Just leave.