Official Chumpettes' Fake Polls Thread

[Spurtacular]

You clearly had no idea what ElNono and I were talking about.

You are not well informed.

You weren't talking about anything. You came here for the ankle biting.

[ChumpDumper]

You weren't talking about anything.

Sure we were. You just don't know what it was.

[Spurtacular]

Sure we were. You just don't know what it was.

Me and Elnono were talking. You came and bit ankles. That's all.

[ChumpDumper]

Me and Elnono were talking. You came and bit ankles. That's all.

I asked you a simple question.

Your response simply proved your ignorance about this subject.

[Spurtacular]

Me and Elnono were talking. You came and bit ankles. That's all.

[ChumpDumper]

Damn, derp is angry about his ignorance.

[ElNono]

If there's a law in place, I'm sure it will be followed. What's your conspiracy theory here?

The law was declared uncons utional at least once already, and it's still going through the courts (not without controversy, if you've read about it).

The only unfortunate thing about this is that it might not be completely off the books by November.

[Spurtacular]

The law was declared uncons utional at least once already, and it's still going through the courts (not without controversy, if you've read about it).

The only unfortunate thing about this is that it might not be completely off the books by November.

1) So, the courts don't always follow the Cons ution?

2) So, we're blaming it on the courts and not so much Republicans now?

[ElNono]

Good rundown here:

https://www.politico.com/states/flor...lorida-1301508

[ElNono]

1) So, the courts don't always follow the Cons ution?

2) So, we're blaming it on the courts and not so much Republicans now?

1) Didn't say that. The only thing I'm lamenting is that justice doesn't move quicker on what appears to be a flagrant violation of voter's rights.

2) The disenfranchising law was written by the GOP, so there's nobody else to blame here for that.

[Spurtacular]

1) Didn't say that. The only thing I'm lamenting is that justice doesn't move quicker on what appears to be a flagrant violation of voter's rights.

2) The disenfranchising law was written by the GOP, so there's nobody else to blame here for that.

1) So the courts always follow the Cons ution even though they apparently didn't?

2) What law was written when? Recently?

[ChumpDumper]

derp

[ElNono]

1) So the courts always follow the Cons ution even though they apparently didn't?

2) What law was written when? Recently?

1) I have no idea what you're talking about. Explain. It's neither always or never, there's plenty of in-between. There's plenty of cases where an injunction was initially granted and then revoked at later stages, for example. That doesn't make either resolutions uncons utional, just part of procedure as a case moves on.

2) The Cons utional Amendment referendum was held in Nov 2018, along with the mid-term elections, the law at issue (SB7086) was passed in March 2019, and issued April 2019. It's been challenged and going through the courts since.