Reply With Quote
And why do you feel the need to note whether or not it's a matter of legality?
Also@ you white knighting for blakehole cos he can't fend for himself.
I think he was an evasive little weasel . Any legal problems from his testimony would be granular and not worth pursuing.
And why do you feel the need to note whether or not it's a matter of legality?
Also
...lots of good sound bites to use against him/Trump that's for sure
"Lack of candor" is a legal term in some instances. Lying in congressional testimony can be prosecuted.
I understand your ignorance.
Yes or no?"Lack of candor" is a legal term in some instances.
I understand your ignorance.
Yes or no what?
Yes or no?
So, do you think that lack of candor makes him unfit for government service?I think I did in an earlier post.
Do go on, what else do you think I was saying?
We were only regarding the one instance."Lack of candor" is a legal term in some instances. Lying in congressional testimony can be prosecuted.
I understand your ignorance.
I understand your need to proactively sperm shield.
I think there are many reasons he is unfit for government service. I didn't see enough of the testimony to characterize it on the whole.
Condolences to your rabbit hole.
No. You just never know what you're talking about.
Sorry about your rabbit hole.
I'm still talking to blakehole and not you. You're the one white knighting it.
Why keep quoting me if you're not talking to me?
Agreed. I reclaim my time.
You didn't lose any time.
I reclaim my time.
There are no time limits here.
I reclaim my time.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
There should be limits for you.There are no time limits here.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
I reclaim my time.
There's no time to reclaim.
You'll just keep replying in an attempt to make up for your perceived Ls.
I reclaim my time.
I reclaim my time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
