Reply With Quote
That's not what the graphics on the link you provided shows. Mid-July both infections and deaths leveled.
Darrin is under the mistaken impression that the virus magically stops spreading after it infected a certain amount of susceptible people.
There's a lot of problems with this theory, but foremost, it's a theory. There's nothing to back it up at this point in time.
That's not what the graphics on the link you provided shows. Mid-July both infections and deaths leveled.
Except the papers showing a substantial percentage of the population with pre-existing immunity via previous exposures to other coronaviruses.
It's not even a theory. It's pure speculation.
Doesn't equal 100% nor 0%
You mean the pre-print papers with no peer review yet?
I've yet to see a number of studies that prove this theory. If you have them, share them.
I'm not knocking the idea, but right now it's gospel, AFAIK.
Seven day moving average of deaths is one.
Flatlined, like my heart stopped? or flat lined, like my heart beats 66bpm for one hour, so it's flat lined on the variation chart?
Uh, ok
Summary
What is already known about this topic?
COVID-19 mortality is higher in persons with underlying
medical conditions and in those aged ≥85 years.
What is added by this report?
Analysis of supplementary data for 10,647 decedents in 16
public health jurisdictions found that a majority were aged
≥65 years and most had underlying medical conditions. Overall,
34.9% of Hispanic and 29.5% of nonwhite decedents were aged
<65 years, compared with 13.2% of white, non-Hispanic
decedents. Among decedents aged <65 years, a total of 7.8%
died in an emergency department or at home.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Understanding factors contributing to racial/ethnic mortality
differences and out-of-hospital deaths might inform targeted
communication to encourage persons in at-risk groups to
practice preventive measures and promptly seek medical care if
they become ill.
Well, Darrin says there's papers that allegedly demonstrates this to be true. So I would put it a step above speculation, but without actual verification is difficult to ascertain.
Like going to almost zero.
stop posting gossip, nobody cares nor reads what you post anymore.
If people are still dying, they didn't stop it. You know the story of the cop and the motorist who slowed down at a stop sign..
Blake determined even one death is unacceptable so you might as well have 300K deaths if you're going to have one.
And seven day average of new cases is 146... I mean, we can all read the data, it doesn't invalidate what I said:
That's not what the graphics on the link you provided shows. Mid-July both infections and deaths leveled.
You said cases ed up but deaths leveled. Not really.
It's still around in Sweden (like everywhere else), but what effect is it having?
The graphs speak for themselves.
cuomo killed more elderly than all deaths in sweden
Exhausting. Interpret them however you like.
It's currently late August, btw.
I know what day it is. I'm pointing out it out because this convo comes from the post I linked.
ding and gossip
thandat the bunker meltdown... shoulda stayed in the bunker
ldren pwnt
cuomo personally killed at least 7k ederly
th
And sweden only 5800
Lolololol
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions