Bald guy Antifa, Nathan? Give us the run down, tbh...
The bald guy in red appears to be the guy shot at the first scene. He was already starting with the guys with guns. The guys with guns also appear to be communicating with high confidence/trust with a black male.
Bald guy Antifa, Nathan? Give us the run down, tbh...
Wiggers
and the KKK/Nazi/white supremacist death toll of jews, blacks, browns FAR surpasses ANY deaths from antifa or protestors.
What an idiot. You'd think people might learn from this guy
Zero denunciations of violence or the shooter from DF, Chris, Spurrtacular and Nathan89.
Maybe the violence isn't what's bothering them.
I've already stated that I thought the shooting while he was trying to run away was justified.
The first shooting is unknown but the guy that got shot showed he was an aggressive and confrontational person in earlier videos. It's not surprising that he got shot.
dont forget george soros was a jewish nazi
You're doing speculative backflips for *some* perpetrators, but not others. No one is fooled by your relativistic ethics.
All I know is moar guns helped EVERYTHING here.
At no point in human history would people watch others do what these rioters are doing. It's foolish to expect people will just stand by and restrain their human nature while the rioters insist on being out of control animals. So if the state insists on failing to protect people and property this is what you will get.
if you are ready to shoot and kill people for committing property damage + you decide to patrol the streets with a rifle during civil unrest when there is known to be property damage going on, then you're just looking to go out and kill somebody.
you might say its not smart for people to be chasing an armed guy down after he just shot somebody, but id also say its not smart to confront a crowd/mob and start shooting people.
yeah once they flashed their guns and fired a warning shot all the rioting stopped
The argument from human nature cuts any way desired. It can be used to justify any course of action at all, including that of the protesters.
If there were "more guns" and less restrictive laws they wouldn't be doing what they are doing. They are expecting others to restrain themselves while they act like animals.
i see you still follow the same liar who claimed garrett foster shot 5 times at the vehicle before he was killed on the street
and yeah, governor should have sent more national guard to protect people from these thugs running around with guns shooting people
Looks like basically anyone can carry assault style weapons at the riot.
What restrictions are there?
Black terrorists just getting back at dangerous White Terrorists
You fight fire with fire
If you don't like it, that'S too bad bro
yup i guess we just have to believe the shooting was justified then
Not restraining the human nature of others brings balance. They'll probably decide to actually peacefully protest instead of violently riot and destroy the city.
Well a couple pages back there was someone saying it's illegal to defend property. I didn't really look at it. This is unnatural restriction.
Will Soros officially canonize this guy and Garrett Foster (posthumously) for all their good work in the BLM push?
But everyone is allowed to bring assault style rifles.![]()
No US city has been destroyed by rioting, that's gross exaggeration.
The government failed to protect people and property. We need to be able to arrest every violent rioter out there.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)