Nah. You're just stuck in your echo chamber. "Liberals" don't try to do anything, just like "conservatives" don't. SOME people have more extreme ways of responding to things they don't like. That can be doxxing. That can be harrassing. That can be screeching on Twitter. That can be death threats. That folks overreact to things is not even slightly political.
The reason why you show such limited perspective on that is that you're get filtered information that highlights when liberals screech online but then presents conservative response as if it's reasonable. Folks burning Nikes, shooting their Keurigs and flushing Gillettes down toilets isn't simply choosing not to partake. It, like all the online harrassment, is an attempt to force change through collective market action. Conservatives really can't do that with most things anymore because rather than being "everyone else" they are a minority who are so insular on most things that their comparative market share is too low to overcome more general support. Nike didn't change their tune due to the "choosing not to partake" because they didn't have to; the folks who bought their stuff BECAUSE they did things like have Kaep on their ads far outweighed the few conservatives who were buying Nikes. That wasn't the case with SNL viewers and Shane Gillis. Liberals owned the market share, so they could more easily affect change through their displeasure.
See, back in the day, conservatives values (at least projecting the current conservative standards back to the day) were held by the vast majority of people with power in the country. That's why folks like John Wayne could be huge stars despite being reprehensible human beings while Ray Charles could literally be banned from a state for not agreeing to sing at a segregated club. Folks were "cancelled" as much then as they are now. George Carlin had a huge fight with folks trying to stop him in the 70s. Ali had fights cancelled just for saying he wouldn't go to Vietnam if drafted (he was banned before they actually tried to draft him). The Beatles had to apologize for suggesting they were bigger than Jesus. I could go on.
Nowadays, it's way more acceptable to have liberal values than conservative. That's because the denial of liberal values is seen as a bigger deal globally -- like being bigoted is just seen as being worse than being unpatriotic in the West. It's also because conservatives have a much smaller population than their political power would suggest. The Overton window for the politicians is center-right just like Romney said. But the window for the people is slightly left of center, much more in line with the rest of the West.