The Weiner laptop: Hunter Biden addition

[TSA]

talk was talk but quality trolling was still a thinking man's game, none of this settle for low hanging fruit bull

disagree. Trolling back in the day was pretty simple especially with the ease of any account you wanted to create. Nowadays you’ve got to be much more nuanced as most people here are posting from their regular account. I find it more entertaining now tbh.

Although I do miss rappin shaq tell me how my ass taste

Was it ever revealed who that was by the way they had an impressive flow

[Nathan89]

Please tell me about how we should get the results of the election to "figure out what the people want" before selecting a justice. How about you.

[Reck]

Nope, can’t and don’t plan on unringing that Q bell here on ST. The problem with your question is that you think I’m like this outside of this board. What would unringing a non-existent Q bell do for me in the real world? You on the other hand can’t cook for yourself and it was hilarious watching you discuss surviving during the initial lockdowns

That makes no sense and the fact you insist on making this an issue is making you look kind of gay. You’re coming off like an aggrieved woman.

And there’s no way you’re not a real life looney tunes when you spend your waking hours peddling seriously ed and insane conspiracies in here.

Between your conspiracies and your so call lavish style full of miss universe orgies, yeah it’s not far fetch you’re just not well adjusted.

Now, cap your night by begging for your 2000 dollars.

[Winehole23]

Please tell me about how we should get the results of the election to "figure out what the people want" before selecting a justice. How about you.

Where were you four years ago?

[Nathan89]

Not related but on the issue of censorship.

[Winehole23]

Where in the Cons ution is the right to a Twitter account mentioned?

[Nathan89]

Feel free to post all the messages from Democrats that are outraged about big tech censorship.

[Reck]

Maybe don’t be a Q and a white supremacist lover and you may get a platform?

These insane people running for senate and house seats think they should be rewarded for being completely unhinged lunatics is something to behold.

This is where Trumpism has led us.

[Winehole23]

Coons (D)
Witzke (R)


SpreadUniversity of Delaware*9/21 - 9/27 Coons +30

Not gonna make up that deficit in three weeks on TWITTER, tbh. Even if Coons keels over he'll probably win.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oons-7066.html

[Winehole23]

Feel free to post all the messages from Democrats that are outraged about big tech censorship.

It's not censorship, but it does suck for Witzke.

[TSA]

That makes no sense and the fact you insist on making this an issue is making you look kind of gay. You’re coming off like an aggrieved woman.

And there’s no way you’re not a real life looney tunes when you spend your waking hours peddling seriously ed and insane conspiracies in here.

Between your conspiracies and your so call lavish style full of miss universe orgies, yeah it’s not far fetch you’re just not well adjusted.

Now, cap your night by begging for your 2000 dollars.

An aggrieved woman can still cook rice, and you can’t.

It was a miss teen not miss universe, and ing one miss teen California is not an orgy.

I don’t consider golfing 4+ times a week to be a lavish lifestyle.

Watching that pussy djohn go into hiding whenever I tell him was worth it.

[Chumpette]

Not related but on the issue of censorship.

Good for democracy.

[Winehole23]

Yep. Republican judges have made it abundantly clear that corporations have 1st amendment rights, which are as broad as being able to dump millions of dollars into elections.

If you don’t like it, take it up with Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas.

I'd like to. Citizens United is a big reason for the fecal political duopoly of the evil of two lessers in this country. In addition to public financing of elections and shortened campaigns with zero private contributions, I wouldn't mind a bit seeing the internet reclassified as a public utility, with all the rules attached.

(FAANG wouldn't sit still for that, though. Sadly, that ship may already have sailed.)

[Reck]

An aggrieved woman can still cook rice, and you can’t.

It was a miss teen not miss universe, and ing one miss teen California is not an orgy.

I don’t consider golfing 4+ times a week to be a lavish lifestyle.

Watching that pussy djohn go into hiding whenever I tell him was worth it.

I’m not required to
That whole miss universe thing is in your head and no one believes you
Has time to golf and post on an online board 10 hours a day for the past 20 years
Assuming that’s true, djohn has a moral trait while you show none and is Shameless about it

What a life. Hard pass

[Winehole23]

Very chummy with sources, the.tao.of.em will go far.

[ElNono]

You don't want Joe Biden's slanderous claim censored?

You're too emotional about this, tbh, calm down. I don't really care personally because I don't consume social media, and it's not like you can't find out what the allegations are.

[ElNono]

can't fault a guy too hard 4 years ago we couldn't imagine all the brazen the GOP would let their boy get away with, like literally everything they've rallied against, Trump has just done most of that and they let him do whatever he wants. It's anyone seeing the last 4 years and still thinking this guy is on the level when he's clearly full of .

I sometimes get the impression these guys don't realize how unpopular and unlikeable Dear Leader is, tbh, and it boggles the mind how much in a mental bubble you can be.

It's not new either, it started off with his dismal inauguration. His job approval has consistently underperformed compared to the last 8-9 presidents, and we had a bunch of corrupt (Nixon) and re s (dubya) in that span, tbh.

I get the whole team sport, want to believe, triggerin' dem libs, etc... but at some point the mental gymnastics have to be extenuating.

[ElNono]

[Spurtacular]

You're too emotional about this, tbh, calm down. I don't really care personally because I don't consume social media, and it's not like you can't find out what the allegations are.

I asked you a question on point. That hardly qualifies as emotional, let alone too emotional.

Should Biden's slanderous tweet be censored?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Reck

Oh, damn; Hunter wasn't hacked. So much for that.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/hunter...air-agreement/

[ElNono]

I asked you a question on point. That hardly qualifies as emotional, let alone too emotional.

Should Biden's slanderous tweet be censored?

Yes or no.

It should not be censored. Government is not allowed to infringe on citizen's 1st Amendment rights, except for very few exceptions.

But that's not what happened here. What Twitter did is well within their rights, and not censorship.

With that out of the way, let's talk opinion.

I'm ambivalent on this. On one hand it does suck to an extent, even if this is ultimately a political stunt/fake news/fake outrage. There's plenty of those on twitter in general (and unfortunately we get to see them here fairly often).

On the other hand, we're dragging these social media companies to Congress, telling them to scrub fake news, not to allow interference with the election (especially considering we had a 3 year investigation confirming actual foreign interference in the previous election, through social media among other channels).

So if you put yourself in the shoes of the company for a minute, you just can't do both things.

In general, I have always preferred wider access to information. However, I do have concerns that there are people out there clearly being effective in targeting a small portion of very gullible and dumb people successfully, so it does give me pause sometimes (not talking about this particular case though, there's much more egregious examples).

[ElNono]

Reck

Oh, damn; Hunter wasn't hacked. So much for that.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/hunter...air-agreement/

Technically, he did. The data isn't owned by the repairman because he salvaged it. Companies like Best Buy have had to pay a good chunk of money due to similar situations.

[Spurtacular]

It should not be censored. Government is not allowed to infringe on citizen's 1st Amendment rights, except for very few exceptions.

But that's not what happened here. What Twitter did is well within their rights, and not censorship.

With that out of the way, let's talk opinion.

I'm ambivalent on this. On one hand it does suck to an extent, even if this is ultimately a political stunt/fake news/fake outrage. There's plenty of those on twitter in general (and unfortunately we get to see them here fairly often).

On the other hand, we're dragging these social media companies to Congress, telling them to scrub fake news, not to allow interference with the election (especially considering we had a 3 year investigation confirming actual foreign interference in the previous election, through social media among other channels).

So if you put yourself in the shoes of the company for a minute, you just can't do both things.

In general, I have always preferred wider access to information. However, I do have concerns that there are people out there clearly being effective in targeting a small portion of very gullible and dumb people successfully, so it does give me pause sometimes (not talking about this particular case though, there's much more egregious examples).

1. I agree that Twitter should not autonomously take down the Tweet. That would make them a publisher, which they are not one, legally. That said, you can't have that standard for Biden and then not afford the same rights to every one else.
2. You just gave a blanket answer that it's okay to censor the NYP story. You give no justification because there is none and then you spend the rest of yourself blabbering on whatever.

[Spurtacular]

On the other hand, we're dragging these social media companies to Congress, telling them to scrub fake news

That's what the authoritarian left is doing. Yes. They are demanding censorship of the stuff they don't like; to which they have labeled it fake news.

[Spurtacular]

In general, I have always preferred wider access to information. However, I do have concerns that there are people out there clearly being effective in targeting a small portion of very gullible and dumb people successfully, so it does give me pause sometimes (not talking about this particular case though, there's much more egregious examples).

People uh muh need to be protected from outlooks deemed harmful

That's what banana republic dictators do.

Pass on your authoritarian left protection.