Page 27 of 36 FirstFirst ... 17232425262728293031 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 675 of 885
  1. #651
    Veteran Degoat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    4,291
    If the Spurs have to give up Aldridge and take back Wiggins, it wouldn't make sense to get Deni. We would need to fill the hole being left at center.
    I’m not so sure the spurs are that worried about the center position, they played Rudy gay at center during the bubble some lol but I could be wrong, I just think it makes more sense for the warriors to be interested in Aldridge Incase the wolves take Wiseman #1

  2. #652
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    I thought I read Wiseman said he didn't want to play for the Timberwolves? Would the Wolves still take him if he said that and refused to play for them?

  3. #653
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    I thought I read Wiseman said he didn't want to play for the Timberwolves? Would the Wolves still take him if he said that and refused to play for them?
    They ran a bluff, and it got called. They then had Ball in for a workout, which I don’t think he does without being told he’s their guy.

  4. #654
    Veteran Degoat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    4,291
    I thought I read Wiseman said he didn't want to play for the Timberwolves? Would the Wolves still take him if he said that and refused to play for them?
    yeah that was reported about Wiseman but still they could draft him as a trade chip or try to convince him that he’s in a good situation there

  5. #655
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    They ran a bluff, and it got called. They then had Ball in for a workout, which I don’t think he does without being told he’s their guy.
    I think Edwards/Wiseman or Wiseman/Edwards could very well be the order with Minny dropping down to 3 ala Boston. Charlotte apparently really wants to move up for Wiseman, but GS wants to stick them with Wiggins to move up to 2. The Hornets could find it cheaper just to bypass GS altogether. In that case, GS either takes Edwards or trades down to a team like SA, and Minny gets Ball.

  6. #656
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    I think Edwards/Wiseman or Wiseman/Edwards could very well be the order with Minny dropping down to 3 ala Boston. Charlotte apparently really wants to move up for Wiseman, but GS wants to stick them with Wiggins to move up to 2. The Hornets could find it cheaper just to bypass GS altogether. In that case, GS either takes Edwards or trades down to a team like SA, and Minny gets Ball.
    If Wiseman goes #1 and we trade with GS (for Deni? Etc) I would think we keep #11 or get the minny #1 they hold for next year...

  7. #657
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    If Wiseman goes #1 and we trade with GS (for Deni? Etc) I would think we keep #11 or get the minny #1 they hold for next year...
    I don't think so. Like we don't know how the two sides value the pieces in this deal, but I think SA would have to give up 11 or at least White/Johnson. Maybe the Minny pick comes back in the deal, maybe not. I also don't know that it's particularly desirable to have 11 too, since they'd definitely be in tax territory. Best I could see would be LMA and Murray for Wiggins and 2. That's salary neutral and probably pays GS more than other teams would to make deal happen.

  8. #658
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    103
    If we have to take Wiggins we have to get rid of another guard. Since DDR is staying there is not enough room in the starting 5 for everyone. White,Murray and Derozan Have to start. So one of them would have to go.

  9. #659
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    If we have to take Wiggins we have to get rid of another guard. Since DDR is staying there is not enough room in the starting 5 for everyone. White,Murray and Derozan Have to start. So one of them would have to go.
    LMA and DJM for Wiggins and 2 actually makes sense for both sides. Problem is the Spurs would probably just draft Edwards at 2 anyway. They'd still have a guard glut.

  10. #660
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    I don't think so. Like we don't know how the two sides value the pieces in this deal, but I think SA would have to give up 11 or at least White/Johnson. Maybe the Minny pick comes back in the deal, maybe not. I also don't know that it's particularly desirable to have 11 too, since they'd definitely be in tax territory. Best I could see would be LMA and Murray for Wiggins and 2. That's salary neutral and probably pays GS more than other teams would to make deal happen.
    All along trading LMA + Murray for Wiggins +2 makes the most sense for both teams to me. I think its probably the best place for Murray to succeed as well.

  11. #661
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    103
    Take Deni at 2.

    white
    DDR
    wiggins
    Deni
    Jakob

  12. #662
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    1,151
    Murry is not going. It is going to be LMA for 2+wiggins. No reason for the Spurs to include someone else.

  13. #663
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    103
    I don’t think the warriors have a backup PG. DJ would be like Shawn Livingston. That might work. The warriors could be asking for white. That’s off the table.

  14. #664
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Post Count
    1,045
    If it is LMA for Wiggins and 2 I’m doing it. Being able to have 2 and 11 would be huge. Also maybe Pop is able to get through to Wiggins and turn him into a more complete player. This gives flexibility to move DDR or keep him and make us a really good offensive team. Even DDR can be a decent defender when he’s engaged. Grab Wiseman and Bey/Williams at 2 and 11

  15. #665
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    Murry is not going. It is going to be LMA for 2+wiggins. No reason for the Spurs to include someone else.
    in this case, that's probably what the FO will do

  16. #666
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    307
    Trade Aldridge and Murray for Wiggins and 2
    Draft Okongwu with 2, draft Maxey with 11
    White
    Derozan
    Wiggins
    Lyle
    Okongwu
    Bench
    Maxey
    Walker
    Johnson
    Gay
    Jacob P

  17. #667
    Veteran K...'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    8,229
    I have no problem with white being traded but he's worth a top 12 pick on top of LMA, so gsw would need to send more for him

  18. #668
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Covington netted 16 + another first. White >> Covington

  19. #669
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Post Count
    1,036
    Stop discussing a trade involving dejounte Murray. Its not happening.

  20. #670
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Post Count
    1,036
    If we have to take Wiggins we have to get rid of another guard. Since DDR is staying there is not enough room in the starting 5 for everyone. White,Murray and Derozan Have to start. So one of them would have to go.

    Not unless they play small like how they did in the bubble. There's only just a handful of teams that still play big.

  21. #671
    Veteran Dejounte's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    15,644
    Not unless they play small like how they did in the bubble. There's only just a handful of teams that still play big.
    Yeah and the teams who play big are the most successful

  22. #672
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    Not unless they play small like how they did in the bubble. There's only just a handful of teams that still play big.
    yes, the teams that have a real chance of win.

  23. #673
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,911
    Teams with HOF-caliber superstars in their prime are the most successful. I think that’s the only true common denominator.

  24. #674
    I want some NASTY! SpurPadre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    14,324
    Covington netted 16 + another first. White >> Covington
    Let's be honest, that's a Spurs fan perception. No one in the sports media sees it that way and there's a chance many in the league don't see it that way, either.

  25. #675
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Let's be honest, that's a Spurs fan perception. No one in the sports media sees it that way and there's a chance many in the league don't see it that way, either.
    Maybe. I disagree but maybe

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •