Page 33 of 36 FirstFirst ... 232930313233343536 LastLast
Results 801 to 825 of 885
  1. #801
    Veteran Spursfanfromafar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    3,110
    Wiggins is the very definition of empty calories who is paid like a superstar but plays like an average starter. The Spurs would be nuts to trade for him in order to take a project like Wiseman.

  2. #802
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    Wiggins is the very definition of empty calories who is paid like a superstar but plays like an average starter. The Spurs would be nuts to trade for him in order to take a project like Wiseman.
    unless they believe that with the SA training system, he has David Robinson potential, in which case it would be stupid not to do so.

  3. #803
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    Taking on Wiggins isn't really a problem. Next off-season you'll have more teams with cap space chasing to few FA's to spend it on. An 'empty calorie' year for Wiggins probably let's us move him for positive value in that environment.

  4. #804
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    I could see a couple version of a 3-way trade here if GSW really wants LMA

    Chicago gets #2

    GS gets LMA + #11

    Spurs get Carter Jr + #4 + Wiggins

    Or

    Chicago gets #2

    GS gets LMA +11 + Carter Jr

    Spurs #4 + 2021 Minny #1 + Wiggins

    -If GSW gets nothing from Chicago, then why is Chicago being included?


    Maybe, if GSW likes WCJ better than 11, then:

    Chicago Gets- #2, Looney

    Spurs Gets-#4, Wiggins

    GS Gets-LMA, WJC


    -It seems more like an either/or with GSW choosing offers between Chicago, The Spurs, or another team.


    -I think that 2021 Minny pick is highly unlikely to be moved. That's probably a top 10 pick, in a much better draft. GSW isn't including, that for sure. So I don't think GSW would do that second trade.

  5. #805
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    -If GSW gets nothing from Chicago, then why is Chicago being included?


    Maybe, if GSW likes WCJ better than 11, then:

    Chicago Gets- #2, Looney

    Spurs Gets-#4, Wiggins

    GS Gets-LMA, WJC


    -It seems more like an either/or with GSW choosing offers between Chicago, The Spurs, or another team.


    -I think that 2021 Minny pick is highly unlikely to be moved. That's probably a top 10 pick, in a much better draft. GSW isn't including, that for sure. So I don't think GSW would do that second trade.
    The only reason would be because GS can't get the spurs to bite on LMA + 11 for Wiggins +2 because they think Wiseman is going at #1... Carter Jr would be the incentive for us to drop to 4 and take Deni...obi etc

  6. #806
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Wiggins is the very definition of empty calories who is paid like a superstar but plays like an average starter. The Spurs would be nuts to trade for him in order to take a project like Wiseman.
    How is that nuts? If the Spurs assessed Wiseman; or someone else, and decided it was worth making such an aggressive move, then they think he has the potential to be a star.

    Taking on Wiggins is a big selling point in their offer to GSW, its how they'd get the number 2 pick. Otherwise GSW probably wouldn't consider our offer.

  7. #807
    Veteran R. DeMurre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,126
    So I guess GSW is still fielding offers or just assessing their options.

    -The Bulls offer gives them an extra asset and still allows them to select Avidija. On the other hand, Carter and Deni don't help GSW win now and they'll have to hold onto Wiggins.

    -The Spurs offer gives Golden State a good player. It allows them to unload a terrible contract and instead of giving up multiple firsts only trades back 9 spots to #2.
    The Bulls were a much better defensive team with Carter on the floor last year. I think he helps right away.

  8. #808
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    The only reason would be because GS can't get the spurs to bite on LMA + 11 for Wiggins +2 because they think Wiseman is going at #1... Carter Jr would be the incentive for us to drop to 4 and take Deni...obi etc
    Sounds unlikely Wiseman goes number 1, seems pretty likely that its Ball or Edwards. Even if he does, then i'm sure that the Spurs would still be willing to make that deal with GSW so they can take Deni.

    Still think that it would be an either/ or with GSW choosing between The Bulls, Spurs, or another team.

  9. #809
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    Sounds unlikely Wiseman goes number 1, seems pretty likely that its Ball or Edwards. Even if he does, then i'm sure that the Spurs would still be willing to make that deal with GSW so they can take Deni.

    Still think that it would be an either/ or with GSW choosing between The Bulls, Spurs, or another team.
    If minny picks #1 yes...but it sounds like they want to move back and teams that are interested in moving up ate looking at Wiseman.

  10. #810
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    The Bulls were a much better defensive team with Carter on the floor last year. I think he helps right away.
    Wendall has a lot of potential but not many 21 year old's can be a key contributor on a team that is trying to make the Finals. If they're thinking about the long term, then sure. Carter, Avdija, and the Minny 2021 first is a very good start towards an eventual Warriors team.

    Otherwise, Aldridge helps more in the short- term. Remains to be seen if another team swoops in with a better offer, that helps GSW win now, though.

  11. #811
    Veteran james evans's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    5,780
    If the Spurs don't have to take back Wiggins I'm fine with it.
    that's the mfer I don't want. I want aldridge gone, but I don't want wiggins. He's worse than Derozen

  12. #812
    Veteran R. DeMurre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,126
    -If GSW gets nothing from Chicago, then why is Chicago being included?


    Maybe, if GSW likes WCJ better than 11, then:

    Chicago Gets- #2, Looney

    Spurs Gets-#4, Wiggins

    GS Gets-LMA, WJC


    -It seems more like an either/or with GSW choosing offers between Chicago, The Spurs, or another team.
    Wow, this would be a haul for the Warriors-- and it seems plausible. Carter showed a lot of growth between his rookie and sop re seasons, so I think it's fair to say he'd be ready to contribute to a Golden State playoff run more than anyone at #11.

  13. #813
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    103
    that's the mfer I don't want. I want aldridge gone, but I don't want wiggins. He's worse than Derozen
    At least Wiggins can shoot the three. If we take Wiggins I don’t understand what the lineup will be. Have to many guards.

  14. #814
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,509
    Disagree. They played completely different in the bubble because they had something to play for while the top 7 teams in each conference already had their seeds set in stone and were treating games as light scrimmages just to get back in game shape without getting hurt. Or do you really believe Phoenix was an elite team because they went 8-0?
    Well Phoenix seems to think their 8-0 bubble record meant something, otherwise they would not have traded for Chris Paul...

    Beyond the record you can just look at the offensive and defensive metrics and splits and see this team was better without Aldridge...although not playing Forbes has a ton to do with that...

    We never get to see Keldon play that well if Aldridge is in the bubble...he would not have been doing anything but watching Aldridge do shoulder fakes and turn around jumpers if he had played...

  15. #815
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,509
    Also it's not like whoever we draft instantly makes the spurs some contender so taking on Wiggins contract right now probably won't be a big deal unless they have plans for a big free agency next season...then yeah wiggins deal could cripple them

  16. #816
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Post Count
    375
    Warriors really need to shed some salary and adding Wendel tacks on another 5.5 million in salary. With luxury tax implications it would probably cost the Warriors over 15 million to do the Bulls deal.
    Warriors would just send Looney back to Bulls. Would send Smiley to Spurs. Salary headaches are not really an issue.

  17. #817
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    If minny picks #1 yes...but it sounds like they want to move back and teams that are interested in moving up ate looking at Wiseman.
    The rumor is that they'd take Wiseman with the intention of trading back, it's possible but I still think they'd go with Ball.

  18. #818
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Post Count
    375
    Taking on Wiggins isn't really a problem. Next off-season you'll have more teams with cap space chasing to few FA's to spend it on. An 'empty calorie' year for Wiggins probably let's us move him for positive value in that environment.
    This is right. If the Spurs can get Wiggins to play defense or limit his long range two point attempts, he'd likely be a positive asset by next summer. Wiggins is a negative asset, but not irredeemably negative.

  19. #819
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    At least Wiggins can shoot the three. If we take Wiggins I don’t understand what the lineup will be. Have to many guards.
    unfortunately he can't hit the shot

  20. #820
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Post Count
    375
    Also it's not like whoever we draft instantly makes the spurs some contender so taking on Wiggins contract right now probably won't be a big deal unless they have plans for a big free agency next season...then yeah wiggins deal could cripple them
    If a big name free agent wants to sign with Spurs, you can attach a pick to him and move him. It's not a big deal. And it's better to have one or two large contracts on payroll in case you need those contracts to make a trade work. Wiggins' deal really isn't a problem.

  21. #821
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    103
    unfortunately he can't hit the shot
    Hey 33% is better than DDR at 28%!

  22. #822
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    Hey 33% is better than DDR at 28%!
    yes, he is a better 3pt shooter than Demar (I really wasn't comparing), but Demar is on another level as an offensive player, however I agree that Wiseman + Wiggins is more valuable than Demar in the current scenario.

  23. #823
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    This is right. If the Spurs can get Wiggins to play defense or limit his long range two point attempts, he'd likely be a positive asset by next summer. Wiggins is a negative asset, but not irredeemably negative.
    But the spurs love those shots

  24. #824
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    307
    Isn't Wiggins 6'8"

  25. #825
    OH YOU LIKE IT!!! slick'81's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    18,493
    If the spurs were picking higher they probably could of pulled this trade off. 2-11 is too big of a drop for g.st

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •