Reply With Quote
So this confirms theyll be back.
QO's make the player a restricted free agent. Any team can then offer a contract to the player, and the Spurs have the option to match any deal to automatically keep them in SA should they so please.
So this confirms theyll be back.
Not if the Spurs choose not to match a contract offer from another team.
Not at all. It only confirms SA can bring them back if they desire. But if they are only willing to pay Jakob 8M per year and some team offers say 12M per year, they can elect not to match that and he will be gone.
It depends on the amount of money other teams offer them. There won't be a market for Quinn or Eubanks, but there could possibly be a small market for Poeltl. If for some reason another team is enamored with Poeltl they could overpay him and the Spurs wouldn't want to match. In simple terms, the ball is in SA's court. They can choose to match, or not match, any contract offers for the three of them this offseason.
Can't the player also accept the qo, poertle won't, but eubanks and witherspoon could
That is correct. We’ve seen it before. Players accept the QO offer and then get to unrestricted free agency the following season.
Yeah, but if no one offers to pay them higher, theyll be back?
Most likely yes. SA can rescind the offer as well technically, but most likely if no one offers higher they will be back. Many times, teams don’t make an actual offer above what the QO has to be. They simply tell the player, go get an offer from another team and we will match that market value.
Poeltl’s QO was 5M (so 1 year, 5M)
Eubanks and Quinn yes. But with Poeltl it depends on the offers he maybe gets. SA wants to hold him, but not at all cost.
If Poetl (along with Eubanks) is back then that gets very interesting if we draft a big.
http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q42
It's a couple of paragraphs into that section. Basically Eubanks has a partially guaranteed one-year deal, and Quinn has a guaranteed two-way deal if they sign.
What the latests rumours ? Spurs making a move ?
The thing is, he's the best player on the team and the team isn't good. It's one thing to alter your game for DeRozan, a 4 year younger pseudo star, but a largely unproven role player like Murray, too?
Put him on a good team and I don't think he'd have much of an issue with altering his approach at this point in his career.
Ouch. Liked Horford for us.
more picks for OC. What are they going to do, start their own expansion team?
Leave it to the kings to not understand how a sign and trade works
Say what you will about what happened with KD/WB/Harden. Since then Presti is lapping other teams. NEVER LEAVE MEAT ON THE BONE.
Wait til sixers fans realize he forgot how to shoot
Don't like this deal for the Thunder at all. Should have got more for taking on that contract. Also, it's not like Horford and Adams can play together. More trades coming up for them.
Like Al Horford is not an awful player. No one wants LMA or Derozan who are actually good and have no risk deals??
How many more picks does Oklahoma need? Are they selling the team?
Great deal for philly. Getting an expiring contract in exchange for that awful horford deal.
When they trade Adam’s it’s like taking on 2 extra years so not a huge deal especially with their empty cap space and tons of picks to move him later if needed. Plus he’s better than Adam’s and they want to be a playoff team while rebuilding
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions