"OFSTATE"
Another great one from the Kraken
"Warning this link may be unsafe"
https://twitter.com/safety/unsafe_li...11.25.2020.pdf
"OFSTATE"
Another great one from the Kraken
The MAGA mob volunteers bull at no charge. It's sort of their job.
this is glorious
What the actual ? Did her spacebar not work or something?
Probably copypasta from various sources like bad pdf scans, but no one even caught it while pasting.
damn
Yeah that’s probably it. Someone ran text recognition on a low quality scanned PDF and didn’t know that after you paste from a scanned PDF into word you need to clean up the text. Powell probably did it herself because she doesn’t have help from any associates or admins in filing these stupid lawsuits
Yep, even that one is all ed up.
Zombie Hugo Chavez
This is the guy alleging the Chavez/Dominion plot
At what point do frivolous filings become sanctionable?
(Not rhetorical, I have no idea how this rule is applied in a courtroom.)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_11Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions
Primary tabs
...
(b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper—whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it—an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the cir stances:
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;
(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
Sanctions are always a high bar to meet. Courts are supposed to presume that allegations are made in good faith, and it's a high burden to show that they're actually made in bad faith. Even though the actual rules say sanctions are appropriate if X and Y happen, the unwritten standard is that sanctions are only issued when lawsuits reach an extraordinary level of frivolous.
Judges also factor what party is requesting sanctions/which party would be getting sanctions. If the party requesting sanctions is the well-funded DNC machine that can spend money on lawyers without breaking a sweat, it's even less likely that a judge would issue sanctions.
That being said, the reason other Trump lawyers always stopped short of alleging fraud was out of fear a judge would order sanctions, the fact Powell is now making baseless fraud claims that involve a guy who's been dead for 7 years makes sanctions more likely. I'm really not sure why the Perkins Coie DNC lawyers / defendants who have been getting sued haven't motioned for sanctions yet.
COVID tbh
(overturning elections and teasing insurrection, like true patriots do)
Perhaps "kraken" is a code name for the taxidermic monstrosity sandwiched between her thighs.
"Ex-Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Files Election Suits in ‘DISTRCOICT’ Court"
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...strcoict-court
Kraken is a good naming choice ... it's pure fantasy, just like her evidence
I'm of sound mine mane
Sidney Powell claims election fraud witnesses are being threatened and beaten up (msn.com)
Tl;dr highlight
Powell did not name any specifics throughout the interview, nor did she provide any evidence to support her claims about witness intimidation.
Naturally.....Powell did not name any specifics throughout the interview, nor did she provide any evidence to support her claims about witness intimidation.
Speaking of Powell....
Sidney Powell's plaintiffs: at least two of them were added to her filings without their knowledge.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)