Reply With Quote
There's not even guidance on something as basic as taking vitamin D. Even though Fauci revealed he was taking 6000 IU/day. Sad
His protocol is literally called I-MASK+ protocol.
There's not even guidance on something as basic as taking vitamin D. Even though Fauci revealed he was taking 6000 IU/day. Sad
Everyone will perform their own little witchcraft dance early on when all we knew was it was viral. And that’s cool. Just don’t kill others by touting a cure that can be harmful. OD on vitamins and herbals is always a go to it seems. Better than disinfectant inhalation or injection.
Who said anything about a cure?
Nicotine (copenhagen longcut) + vitamins
Also had chloroquine phosphate by prescription in the medicine cabinet. Never took it mainly because I wasn't sure if I had covid. There was no testing available and the cdc was still claiming the risk to the public is low
In retrospect I should have gotten a script for HCQ instead but the in vitro study for HCQ hadn't even been done at that time.
Ah the old + leading to Zinc or some other item off the shelf.
Its great for the vitamin nuts. People with normal metabolic functions do just fine with a varied American diet. This megadosing vitamins does make some people rich though. It’s helpful that it usually just runs through you without hurting too much. (Kidneys maybe a problem long term for some of the water solubles.)
Do what you must, Fauci did. I try to stay very hydrated with the common cold, might do some good.
Winehole is touting snorting iodine
Sorry prevention.
Yeah, our president and his aquarium chemicals.
This is not the same as snake or I coming with the chewing tobacco and the hydration (respectively)
Add Winehole to the list of pgardn, Darrin, snake. I have read zero about it but I would be careful with iodine in general.
But the thing is, we can make fun of each other; the president... well, some people actually believe the guy.
. BIG Vitamin. I knew it was too good to be true.
Current recommendation:
Go home and isolate
Go to the hospital when you can't breathe
...
not true
I know many physicians are basically following the protocol for outpatient treatment, outside of their recent recommendation on ivermectin. It's all perfectly safe and reasonable stuff that may lower risk of serious illness. That's where pgardn and others get it wrong when they start using the word cure. In medicine "cure" doesn't really exist for viral illnesses. Most other illness either.
Fauci is a big pharma
You mentioned it therefore you touted it. ST rules.
It will be sad if we eventually learn that Ivermectin could've prevented needless hospitalizations and deaths. I think there are even studies showing it helps the "long haulers".
Time to watch 28 days later
Porton Johnson is one of the weakest leaders in recent history. He is making a defeated Trump look like Spartacus
It would also be sad, and maybe a little dangerous, to offer false security to people based on hunches about OTC meds and anecdotes about off-label experimentation with prescription drugs.
this would be akin to cancelling Black Friday in the US
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedici...l.pmed.1003402What did the researchers do and find?
- Using recently released national data on COVID-19 deaths by racial/ethnic group and age, along with US Census population data, we explored variation in mortality risk by calculating age-specific mortality measures in the above groups as well as in the non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population, the 5 census-defined groups for which data are available.
- We found that for all groups, as compared to the non-Hispanic White population, there were excess COVID-19 deaths across all ages. Although for all racial/ethnic groups, most deaths occurred at older ages, there was also striking loss of life at younger ages, before age 65, among people of color.
- More years of life were lost before 65 years among the non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, despite the smaller size of these groups, than among the non-Hispanic White population. Scrutinizing age-specific mortality rates, we found that for young adults into midlife, comparatively, the non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native populations had a much higher risk of death from COVID-19 than the non-Hispanic White population.
What do these findings mean?
- These data support the conclusion that US populations of color die of COVID-19 at younger ages as well as at higher rates than the non-Hispanic White population.
- Enhancing protection from infection, including assurance of workplace protections, may be relevant to prevention of COVID-19 in working-age adults.
"sad if we eventually learn that Ivermectin ..."
the most sad, the "sadist"?, is that 74M of you rightwingnutjob assholes refused to wear masks, to social distance, and were gulled by lying Trash, his corrupt mafiya, and less Repugs
into worsening, causing a national health and economic disaster that has and will sicken and kill many 100Ks of Americans,
damages that will last for years.
but you ing "owned the libs, owned the science"
Current epicenter is California, dude
dude, SoCal (south of LA) and interior Cal are rightwing areas.
Also 40% Hispanic/Latino, poor people in crowded quarters that couldn't afford not to work, dude
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
