There's A Storm On Horizon I Reckon

[Spurtacular]

That’s absolutely how it goes. How do you think Section 230 came to be? It was the fallout from a couple of similar lawsuits in the late 90s.

It's not going down like that. Our court systems aren't getting into that trite stuff. You're being absurd.

[ElNono]

You can’t be naive/stupid to think a trial lawyer rather sue the Chrissybot user rather than Twitter, when they’re both liable.

If you are, then stop posting.

[Spurtacular]

You can’t be naive/stupid to think a trial lawyer rather sue the Chrissybot user rather than Twitter, when they’re not liable.

If you are, then stop posting.

Have another beer, dude.

[ElNono]

It's not going down like that. Our court systems aren't getting into that trite stuff. You're being absurd.

lmao, our court system gets into what’s the law. If the law says Twitter or Facebook are liable, then they’re liable. Courts don’t make law, Congress does.

[ElNono]

Have another beer, dude.

What does this has to do with what we’re discussing? Do you think you go to a judge and tell them that?

[Blake]

That's the land of absurd.

Says derp right before he posts another gateway pundit tweet

[ElNono]

Now that you seemingly understand how absurd it is to blow Section 230, then maybe we can have a conversation on how it should not be blown up, but these companies be regulated better to avoid common pitfalls.

But, I tell you, the real issue here is that one party doesn’t like lies published and the other wants to lie at will, and there’s no solution to that.

[Spurtacular]

Now that you seemingly understand how absurd it is to blow Section 230

On the basis of your lame argumentation, I don't "understand" it to be absurd at all. But I do think that its elimination may very well be used to stifle compe ion all the same. The govt. wants to turn the internet into a red tape jungle as a means of control.

[Spurtacular]

Says derp right before he posts another gateway pundit tweet

Gateway Pundit just isn't suitable reading for cuckolds, is it?

[Spurtacular]

[ElNono]

On the basis of your lame argumentation, I don't "understand" it to be absurd at all. But I do think that its elimination may very well be used to stifle compe ion all the same. The govt. wants to turn the internet into a red tape jungle as a means of control.

I’ve no idea what you’re talking about now. This is another ‘gubmint bad’ babble.

Let me remind you what your and maga butthurt is here: you’re mad that a private company doesn’t allow you to make up and get away with it, and you want the government to step in and force their hands on that.

(That would be the same government that ‘wants to turn the internet into a red tape jungle’, whatever that conspiracy means)

[ElNono]

Gateway Pundit just isn't suitable reading for cuckolds, is it?

Gateway pundit is fake news. Basically, it can be auto-ignored.

What about the other 8 judges? They’re all on tape? Lmao

lol gab

[Spurtacular]

I’ve no idea what you’re talking about now. This is another ‘gubmint bad’ babble.

I spoke in plain English. Don't waste my time, kid.

[Spurtacular]

Gateway pundit is fake news. Basically, it can be auto-ignored.
lol gab

Funny how badly opposing viewpoints hurt your feelings. It is what it is.

[spurraider21]

You should also familiarize yourself with Section 230(c)(2), what’s known as ‘the Good Samaritan’ clause, on what you call censorship. It’s specifically stipulated in the law they can do what they’re doing as long as it’s done in good faith.

Again, inform yourself first, then come back to have a discussion.

the Good Samaritan clause, which requires good faith (not political neutrality) is also what prevents every forum from becoming 4chan. If the act of moderation (say, banning certain racial slurs) becomes legally synonymous with being a publisher, you either have to become 4chan or lawyer up

[ElNono]

Funny how badly opposing viewpoints hurt your feelings. It is what it is.

Lies don’t hurt my feelings, they waste my time. You would know.

[ElNono]

the Good Samaritan clause, which requires good faith (not political neutrality) is also what prevents every forum from becoming 4chan. If the act of moderation (say, banning certain racial slurs) becomes legally synonymous with being a publisher, you either have to become 4chan or lawyer up

Yep, exactly why I pointed it out.

But this is coming from people that think outright lying and fan fiction is merely ‘another viewpoint’ or ‘alternative facts’, which anybody that knows even the bare minimum about law understands is idiotic (as Lin Wood found out as well).

[ElNono]

I spoke in plain English. Don't waste my time, kid.

selective quoting, 30 alts, full time job deflecting here and ing about wasting anybody’s time. The irony of this response.

[Soldier Lives Matter]

[Winehole23]

the election rigging claim is evidence-free

[spurraider21]

fake quote from Trey Gowdy

derp peddling fake news from gab, per par

[pgardn]

What does this has to do with what we’re discussing? Do you think you go to a judge and tell them that?

It basically means you crushed his posts or embarrassed him or both.

[Blake]

Gateway Pundit just isn't suitable reading for cuckolds, is it?

It's only suitable for derps®️

[pgardn]

Lies don’t hurt my feelings, they waste my time. You would know.

I personally understand you are actually concerned about his mental state and well-being.
But you seriously need to just keep body slamming him, its all he understands.

[pgardn]

Gateway Pundit just isn't suitable reading for cuckolds, is it?

Its for people who like right wing lies.
This is exactly what it is derp.