Olive branch to Trump supporters

[MASSA]

No
Yes. Sorry the truth hurts.

Ad hom is not about whether the attack is truthful or not.
You're the same person who got on your high horse about not understanding logical fallacies.

[ElNono]

so is Derp finally coming out as a full blown Nazi who follows Hitler's ideology? Not sure if he knows the Hitler quote he posted was intended to be flattering to Hitler.

I’m gonna go with he has no idea what he posted, somebody on garb posted it and he thought it sounded cool/witty.

[Spurminator]

I assume the Hitler quote you guys are talking about from derp was in response to my post, but I wouldn't know because I have him on ignore.

[spurraider21]

Of course derp is a hitler apologist. He starts by denying the holocaust

[Blake]

Ad hom is not about whether the attack is truthful or not.
You're the same person who got on your high horse about not understanding logical fallacies.

You're derp®️

[Spurtacular]

Of course derp is a hitler apologist. He starts by denying the holocaust

I'm sorry this is happening to you.

[Trainwreck2100]

I assume the Hitler quote you guys are talking about from derp was in response to my post, but I wouldn't know because I have him on ignore.

no quoting just a random hitler quote, kinda outing him as a ing nazi sympathizer.

[Spurtacular]

I assume the Hitler quote you guys are talking about from derp was in response to my post, but I wouldn't know because I have him on ignore.

In case anyone forgot your other press releases that you're a snowflake, Sadbert.

[Spurtacular]

no quoting just a random hitler quote, kinda outing him as a ing nazi sympathizer.

Oh, the humanity!

[Monostradamus]

[DMC]

You're still trying to downplay and distract from the fact that he was your candidate. None of the flaws or poor strategy or weak candidates from the left make up for the fact that he represents your side and you voted for him, and then continued to defend his actions.

It's on record here prior to the election that you're full of

[DMC]

You're the only person here defining " ty" in terms of winning and losing. I would venture to say that Adolf Hitler was a tier candidate than any of his opponents. You would spend years celebrating and defending him because he was a winner. That's the difference between us.

Of course, I don’t have the same moral stick up my ass you do. What good is a candidate who can't beat Trump?

Reductio ad Hitler is a white flag

Reductio ad Hitlerum (/ˈhɪtlərəm/; Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card,[1][2] is an attempt to invalidate someone else's position on the basis that the same view was held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.[3] One example would be that since Hitler was against smoking, this implies that someone who is against smoking is a Nazi.[4]

Coined by Leo Strauss in 1953, reductio ad Hitlerum borrows its name from the term used in logic called reductio ad absurdum ("reduction to the absurd").[5] According to Strauss, reductio ad Hitlerum is a form of ad hominem, ad misericordiam, or a fallacy of irrelevance. The suggested rationale is one of guilt by association. It is a tactic often used to derail arguments because such comparisons tend to distract and anger the opponent.[6

[Blake]

I'm sorry this is happening to you.

Derp®️ thinks regurgitating the lines originally thrown at him helps him win the internet. Poor guy

[Blake]

Oh, the humanity!

Not even denying it. Lol derp®️

[Blake]

Of course, I don’t have the same moral stick up my ass you do. What good is a candidate who can't beat Trump?

You still don't understand what he meant by " ty candidate"

Goddam you're a moron

[spurraider21]

Of course, I don’t have the same moral stick up my ass you do. What good is a candidate who can't beat Trump?

Reductio ad Hitler is a white flag

Reductio ad Hitlerum (/ˈhɪtlərəm/; Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card,[1][2] is an attempt to invalidate someone else's position on the basis that the same view was held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.[3] One example would be that since Hitler was against smoking, this implies that someone who is against smoking is a Nazi.[4]

Coined by Leo Strauss in 1953, reductio ad Hitlerum borrows its name from the term used in logic called reductio ad absurdum ("reduction to the absurd").[5] According to Strauss, reductio ad Hitlerum is a form of ad hominem, ad misericordiam, or a fallacy of irrelevance. The suggested rationale is one of guilt by association. It is a tactic often used to derail arguments because such comparisons tend to distract and anger the opponent.[6

nothing resembling this happened

[Spurminator]

Of course, I don’t have the same moral stick up my ass you do. What good is a candidate who can't beat Trump?

Sometimes the better candidate loses. That's not always a function of the candidate. Sometimes it's a function of an ignorant voting population. The voter is not always right.

Reductio ad Hitler is a white flag

Reductio ad Hitlerum (/ˈhɪtlərəm/; Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card,[1][2] is an attempt to invalidate someone else's position on the basis that the same view was held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.[3] One example would be that since Hitler was against smoking, this implies that someone who is against smoking is a Nazi.[4]

Coined by Leo Strauss in 1953, reductio ad Hitlerum borrows its name from the term used in logic called reductio ad absurdum ("reduction to the absurd").[5] According to Strauss, reductio ad Hitlerum is a form of ad hominem, ad misericordiam, or a fallacy of irrelevance. The suggested rationale is one of guilt by association. It is a tactic often used to derail arguments because such comparisons tend to distract and anger the opponent.[6

Fallacy-calling is also a tactic used to distract.

I suppose I could derail the conversation by bringing up alts or marital issues like you always do.

[DMC]

You still don't understand what he meant by " ty candidate"

Goddam you're a moron

If it was a moral issue why did he vote for her? Exactly. People who create alts so they can run their mouth recklessly online don't have a real moral compass, they just have a moral billboard

[DMC]

Sometimes the better candidate loses. That's not always a function of the candidate. Sometimes it's a function of an ignorant voting population. The voter is not always right.



Fallacy-calling is also a tactic used to distract.

I suppose I could derail the conversation by bringing up alts or marital issues like you always do.

You say that like it's a matter of fact when really it's just subjective opinion.

I mean, you seem to lack any moral compass, courage or dignity unless you're being watched while Blake only has a problem detecting a fresh ed pussy laying next to him.

[Blake]

If it was a moral issue why did he vote for her? Exactly. People who create alts so they can run their mouth recklessly online don't have a real moral compass, they just have a moral billboard

Then it's funny you flipped on Trump and voted Biden

[DMC]

Then it's funny you flipped on Trump and voted Biden

So it's not about her as a person and it's not about her ability to win it's about some other intangible that only you gots know about

[Winehole23]

damn, somebody's still carrying a grudge

[Blake]

So it's not about her as a person and it's not about her ability to win it's about some other intangible that only you gots know about

She was just less reprehensible than Trump. This isn't difficult.

[Th'Pusher]

So it's not about her as a person and it's not about her ability to win it's about some other intangible that only you gots know about

Why the are you still talking about Hilary Clinton? She was a ty candidate, and lost the EC to a ty candidate because her campaign miscalculated.

Why are you wearing her loss like a badge on of honor four years later even after the ty candidate she lost to just lost the election?

The dems accomplished their goal. They made Trump the first one term president in nearly 30 years.

You’re a petty, low value add harping on ing HRC.

[Spurminator]

You say that like it's a matter of fact when really it's just subjective opinion.

No, by definition it's my opinion. But it's certainly hard to argue otherwise when we have literal audio evidence of your guy trying to persuade people to conjure up non-existent votes so he can maintain control of the presidency.

I have only expressed opinion in this thread. You objected to those opinions based on your own arbitrary rules about who can be called ty.

I mean, you seem to lack any moral compass, courage or dignity unless you're being watched while Blake only has a problem detecting a fresh ed pussy laying next to him.

I seriously never thought the Adam Lambert alt would lodge itself so permanently and destructively in someone's brain.