You rooted for Trump but voted for Harris. You're weird.
Why haven't Austinite's mastered safe practices?
You rooted for Trump but voted for Harris. You're weird.
There are enough re ed Texans in every town to ruin it for the rest of us. I mean, look who our governor is.
You sound like a real peach.
Check the stats on Austin, we've done well relative to other Texas cities.
I would've thought the dude ing your wife had already ruined it for you.
I credit your Zoomacracy.
But kudos to white Austin progressives. Keep carrying that virtue torch.
Everybody had a Zoomocracy during the pandemic, silly.
The one out of five Austinites not blessed with "white skin" wear masks and social distance too.
Be careful with that torch of anti-wokeness, hoods and robes are flammable!
So is hard liquor tbh
Says the re ed forum drunk
Get some new material.
It works fine still, DrunkenS
So is your beard, you must have been tempted to shave it off after getting singed so badly the past few weeks.
![]()
This is so ing desperate
It was from alt-right news source ABC news.
Haphazardly playing cards.
SMH, Sadbert.
It wouldn't have hurt Biden or helped Republicans to acknowledge "warp speed" money hastened clinical trials. It would also have been more honest than the "the cupboard was bare'' motif.
Oddly enough, raving lunatic Peter Navarro deserves some of the credit for being a gigantic asshole about the urgency of spending billions of dollars to do it.
Pottinger, sensing that he’d need backup, had brought along Peter Navarro, an abrasive economic adviser who had been part of the trade negotiations with China. Many White House officials considered Navarro to be a crackpot, but he was known to be one of the President’s favorites because he advocated tariff wars and other nationalist measures. Navarro warned the group, “We have got to seal the borders now. This is a black-swan event, and you’re rolling the dice with your gradualist approach.”
Within minutes, Navarro was at odds with everyone in the room. He pointed out that the new virus was spreading faster than the seasonal flu or sars. The possible economic costs and loss of life were staggering. Azar argued that a travel ban would be an overreaction. No progress was made in that meeting, but Navarro was so strident that Mulvaney barred him from future sessions.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...he-plague-yearPottinger and Navarro, the China-trade adviser, advocated for a way to radically shorten the time frame: companies would be paid to manufacture vaccine candidates that were still in trials and might never be used. If any ended up being successful, Americans could be inoculated in less than a year.
At the end of February, Navarro wrote a memo proposing a three-billion-dollar supplemental budget appropriation to cover the cost of an accelerated vaccine process, P.P.E. for frontline workers, and effective therapeutics. Azar recognized the need for a major budget supplement, but after he met with Mulvaney, Trump’s acting chief of staff, he declared that eight hundred million dollars was enough for now.
I don't care who published it, it's absolutely re ed to suggest that Biden should be heaping praise on the Trump Administration as a sign of "unity."
It suggests that we cater to conservatives' ET-and-Elliot like emotional dependency on Donald Trump being complimented. Unity is about a lot more than that.
Why should we act like a rush of government funds towards vaccine development was some uniquely Trumpian idea? About the only thing about it that has Trump's stamp is the branding. Big deal. Any competent administration would have gotten that done and wouldn't have needed a ton of pressure from a Peter Navarro.
Have we already forgotten that the Trump administration turned down a hundred million additional doses from Pfizer in December?
While we're at it, why don't we ask why the Biden administration has yet to give Donald Trump any credit for not nuking Mexico?
How about just not stealing credit, then? Or would that trigger you too much, Sadbert?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)