It's called a planned attack on our sovereignty/freedom to usher in their neo-communist dystopia.
Wearing what?
I did my part to save the US from Trump.
You're #stillwithhim.![]()
It's called a planned attack on our sovereignty/freedom to usher in their neo-communist dystopia.
kori's Mad Libs.
when in doubt, add "neo" before a term to sound smarter!
Pro baseball didn't even exist the last time USA was doing this stuff
I have a feeling you will try and relect this circus.
When in doubt, hire a paralegal to do all your hard work and lay claim to it as if you are worth to begin with.
You also want to know why I say neo-communism? Or are you just here to condescend? You're a straight up SR.
work smarter, not harder![]()
"circus"
You're #stillwith Donald ing Trump!![]()
kori envy
sure. lay it on me. i didnt think you actually wanted to discuss it, as you otherwise never seem willing to define the terms you use
I call it neo-communism because it's basically a "new" form where corporations & ins utions basically call the shots and not "the people" or the "working class" which was always the basis of communism but only in text not in practice. In practice all perish regardless.
so you think communism or "neo-communism" is where corporations control everything?
thats an... interesting take
sounds more like what people call anarcho-capitalism (even though i dont think that its truly an anarchist ideology)
No, I think both are a farce presented to the everyday man with the intention of getting them to buy into a ideology that will eventually eat them alive.
but giving more power to privately controlled corporations is a direct contradiction to even the most basic understanding of what communism is.
its one thing to say that regimes that called themselves communist never had any real intention of delivering a true communist outcome (and i'd actually largely agree with you). but thats different than somehow saying that the literature/theory itself is a farce, that doesnt make much sense imo
political theory is something i took interest in during college. havent read much literature since then, though.
Last edited by spurraider21; 04-15-2021 at 02:41 PM.
Even Marx himself knew Communism was total and utter bull and stated so later in life.
The argument that "real" Communism hasn't been implemented is perpetuated by idiots like yourself. Communism has been implemented correctly and it's lead to its eventual goal which is total control of the masses and death for most. The end goal is always the same no matter where it's been implemented.
Jesus christ you are a ing IDIOTyou have no idea what you're talking about ever. go back to the playground and eat some glue you re ed
Elaborate then but I won't be holding my breath. You literally add nothing to any conversation JK.
why bother explaining anything to a simpleton? you don't even know what the words you use mean. i might as well explain it to a gerbil![]()
what?
this is what i'm talking about, though. communism wasn't some half baked idea of "lol utopia"... there's a lot of literature and theory on the subject. communism refers to an ideology which seeks to establish a stateless, classless, and effectively, a de-commodified society. i think its safe to say that this has never existed in any real sense, even if we removed the stateless criterion. , the closest thing to this is probably primitive tribesThe argument that "real" Communism hasn't been implemented is perpetuated by idiots like yourself. Communism has been implemented correctly and it's lead to its eventual goal which is total control of the masses and death for most. The end goal is always the same no matter where it's been implemented.
and again, if your argument is that historically, we have seen aspiring leaders use the supposed allures of communism as a means to gain support, but ultimately seize complete control, then it seems that we are in complete agreement.
Somebody did the math - the democrats were less than 100k votes from losing all 3 - POTUS/Senate/House. And some of them are acting like it was a landslide win and a mandate for major change. Now just imagine if they had a super majority. They'd probably try and purchase countries to the south of us and get at least 10 more senators added to their stock pilePelosi and Schumer power drunk like a mofo.
Trump was saying his win was a landslide for years and Sleepy Joe beat him by basically the same amount of electoral votesanyone who claims it was a landslide is clearly trolling because of trump's insistence that his 2016 win was a "landslide"
It wasn't particularly close.
The EC tried it's best though. Losing by 7 million votes and calling it a close shave is not exactly johnny on the spot.
well yeah, the electoral college is just affirmative action for the republican party. biden won by 7 mil votes nationally. it is fairly absurd that the electoral college race was as close as you've described
And that was always some BS. He lost the popular vote to Hillary and claimed millions of illegal immigrants voted giving her the edge![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)