Reply With Quote
dim pool doesnt read the interview, just twitter headliens
she methodically explains why based on the evidence and arguments that she would have voted guilty
Is all Chris does now post youtuble clips or random tweets?
she methodically explains why based on the evidence and arguments that she would have voted guilty
its a long interviewRaguse: You were an alternate, but would you have voted guilty or not guilty?
Christensen: I would have voted guilty. However, at the end the judge did read us the rules for deliberation, but it was quick, and I could not absorb it. I would have said guilty on some level. After I was excused, I did not look at the jury instructions any longer. I do not know how hard that process was, but I feel like Chauvin is responsible for Mr. Floyd’s death.
Raguse: Why?
Christensen: I think the prosecution did a good presentation of their case. Dr. (Martin) Tobin was the one I really related to. I feel like all the doctors in one way or another said the same thing.
Raguse: Do you think the use of force was reasonable?
Christensen: I do not.
Raguse: Do you think that Derek Chauvin caused George Floyd’s death?
Christensen: I feel like the kneeling on the neck for so long did, yes.
Raguse: You heard a lot of testimony about use of force, was the force reasonable and did the knee cause Floyd’s death. Did it seem like those were the major questions that were presented to you?
Christensen: Yes, we heard a lot about the use of force, was it excessive, was it necessary, when do police officers stop it, and could it have been stopped at one point. I kept thinking about the critical decision-making model that was presented. It was in the back of my mind about how they said you must reassess constantly, and I felt like that was not done.
Raguse: Which witness convinced you that it was an unreasonable use of force?
Christensen: I thought (LAPD sergeant) Jody Stiger, the prosecution expert, did a good job of explaining it to us.
Raguse: Was it meaningful to you to have Minneapolis police officers testify against Chauvin?
Christensen: It was. Some of the trainers said, “I don’t even know what that is, we don’t train like that.” That was helpful to hear because they said they can use force, but it did not seem like they could use that type of force.
Qhrisbot with another L
Rightwingers and context...not best of friends.its a long interview
No. But, it's pretty clear Tim Pool doesn't know what a mistrial is either.
Just shows you that posters with bot-like behavior have a very low AI iq.
I expect that when they see your comments, they will post something to the effect of "does not compute!"
Imagine if Chauvin hadn't murdered him.
It’s almost like Floyd should have been charged with resisting arrest and Chauivin shouldn’t have murdered him
(same band, I think.)
E
The GF/ Chauvin trial was a kangaroo court, filled with numerous actions by the Judge and the State of Minnesota which will qualify as reversible error by a reasonable Appeals Court, namely: (1) Not granting Defense Change of Venue Motion; (2) Not granting an immediate mistrial when the City of Minneapolis announced its $27 Million Settlement with GF family, which gave even more weight to granting the Change of Venue, not issuing an instruction to the jury immediately, and then before deliberations begin to disregard; (3) Judge allowing Prosecution Attorneys way too much leeway during cross examination of Defense Expert Witness, to the point where such attorneys were actually testifying, instead of examining; (4) Judge allowing way too much testimony in certain areas from State witnesses, which effect was ulative; (5) Major Discovery Violations by the State with their constant, last minute dumping of massive amounts of evidence; (6) allowing numerous fact witnesses, especially in the beginning part of the trial, such as the "MMA Expert" to offer opinions, instead of restricting their testimony to actual facts. He should have stricken such testimony from the record, given an instruction to the jury immediately and before deliberations begin, to disregard such testimony, admonished the State for eliciting testimony that they knew was inappropriate; (7) Other Discovery Violations, which should have resulted in a mistrial, when the State "discovered" new evidence
Republicans going all in on behalf of a killer is the least surprising thing ever.
Louisville police department staffing 'in dire straits' amid high crime rates, recruitment woes: union
They need to pull an Arizona and become a blue state, tbh
Chauvin juror Brandon Mitc on CBS: "We were just stressed about just the simple fact that every day we had to come in and watch a Black man die. That alone is stressful. Coming in each and every day and having to watch somebody die is stressful enough by itself."
This case the judge said to leave race out if it
This should be put in the appeal
"noticing the victim belonged to a racial group" is not grounds for appeal
Why mention black
Why not say person die
Does it matter what color they are?
I guess Black Lives Matter matter only to you
Do black lives not matter to you, ducks?
Do black lives not matter to you, ducks?
Certainly not more than my life.
LOL no.
What he means is that is stressful to watch someone die over and over again. Chauvin is going to jail, period. He can appeal and watch them all fail.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
