If you say so, Dr Darrin.
Are you"doo dooing" the good news about HCQ? Did you switch brand loyalty?
More pre-publication doo doo from WH.
The data on Ivermectin is incontrovertible
If you say so, Dr Darrin.
Are you"doo dooing" the good news about HCQ? Did you switch brand loyalty?
Cool with me as long as these other supposed preventatives are not used INSTEAD of a vaccine by people who have no physical problem getting vaccinated. Because we know the vaccine works extraordinarily well. This last administration being so anti-science has caused concern about how to pose these things to the public who clearly have a penchant for the most bizarre derptocrapic thinking.
I don't care about HCQ.
The last admin made these vaccines possible, by pre ordering.
There is no brand for HCQ or Ivermectin, btw. Patents long expired. They are generic.
True.
We also had one-sixth of the world's total COVID deaths here in the USA because of the Trump administration's lies, bull and incompetence.
572,666 deaths
Thanks, Doc
Not anymore....
What president wouldn't do just that?
There is no good data on ivermectin
If there was some proven treatment, we'd lose EUA for vaccines.
Other than the dozens of RCTs.
How do you figure?
You watch twiv, so you can make it through this
Sounds like your claim depends on how "adequate" is defined by the FDA.
How does the FDA define it? What threshhold of efficacy would have to be met?
Didn't make any claims. Posted a link.
Yeah, you did. You said EUAs for vaccines would no longer be in effect if an "adequate" treatment were to be discovered.
Contextually, it's clear you're referring to Ivermectin, and that you do think it's an adequate preventative for COVID-19.
"Incontrovertible evidence," right?
Pretty much laid out in first 40 seconds of this video
So Darrin has an Ivermectin conspiracy theory.
I've been following it. Obviously, you have not.
I've posted a few things here on Ivermectin, but I'm not committed personally like you. I have no reason to doubt you've read everything you can that agrees with your conclusion.
I notice you brushed off Snake Boy with a rough count of studies and zero cites, is it possible he knows the lit and the science somewhat better that you?
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)