Reply With Quote
hes not an actor. Hes a talk show host.
"shut up"
inb4 "this is a fringe opinion" from Spotify's number one most popular podcast host
he needs to shut up an dribble... I think that was the gist of the comment...
Joe Rogan will be 100% absolutely fine.
Murica is a sycophancy before it's a morally honest society.
Joe Rogan is a 50-50 guy like OP, but doesn't need to back track one-millionth the distance as OP because he has an audience of tools that live to worship elitists.
He'll on something conservative when it's trendy and the few that truly flipped on him will come back to him with open arms and an excuse handy to down play their moral dishonesty when no one really cares.
We gave R. Kelly 3 chances over a 15 year time frame, despite definitive video evidence. Michael Jackson is a sexual pedophile and his catalog is worth half a billion dollars and his albums are still in the top 100 to this day.
Joe Rogan is fine. Muricans don't care. What we do and what we say are two entirely different things.
Who would say that?
BTW, we're on page 5, Sadbert. A little late for that, don't ya think?
He is best at an MMA announcer and its not even close.
so he is limited.
This is Rogan's dribbling. So the gist is that Sadbert is a ing re .
What a surprise; the capacity for which he doesn't punch you in the vagina.
His job is to talk
His job is to talk
And Sadbert is probably one of the brighter blue anon bulbs if I'm being honest.This is Rogan's dribbling. So the gist is that Sadbert is a ing re .
Don't be morally dishonest enough to degrade his accomplishments. He's one of the undisputed top podcasters, ever. He commands top-dollar when he takes stand-up gigs (to be fair, it's because of his visibility, but he has an audience that will justify his booking fee) and he did a load of TV even before he was with the UFC, including being the only funny thing on the revamped Man-Show.
I don't take you for a simp, but that was a simp post.
You got trolled.His job is to talk
You got trolled.This is Rogan's dribbling. So the gist is that Sadbert is a ing re .
I don’t give a fck.
Ive listened to him and he makes horrific arguments all the time. He has a good voice and is entertaining.
But imo he sucks as a podcaster and is FAR better as an MMA announcer. Top dollar? Who the fck cares? That’s the accomplishment? Well some of the most popular bands that drew top dollar in their day get cast off upon review.
This makes me morally dishonest? Seriously? Because he makes bucks and I say he is better at MMA?
Wow. You are a tough sell.
Im keeping with my assessment and you can consider me a moral degenerate. Top $ rules.
Limited in others eyes? I guess not, top dollar?
Sadbert doing simp posts by your own admission is trolling me?You got trolled.
SMH. Total ing dip .
You just lash out at anyone and everything that doesn't suit the agenda of your overlords.
You're a pretty low-level Chumpette if I'm being honest.
Find a friend derp.Sadbert doing simp posts by your own admission is trolling me?
SMH. Total ing dip .
You don’t wanna look back at your rules for a human life.
Morally dishonest on an opinion. Yep, I’m not human now. Execute
Overlords.
Is this some sort of cheap video game derp?
What do my overlords tell me, what is the agenda?
You checkmated yourself. Don't lash out.
Don't be coy. You know when your marching orders come down the pike; and you act accordingly.
Just like the other thread you want out of.
So I have lost twice.
For an opinion I am morally bankrupt.
And for your definition of a human life and who needs to die and who needs to be saved.
You called it, The Lords Work. I lose to you, the Lord.
Coy?
I literally have zero idea who my overlords are so I need you to tell me.
You make the rules on human lives and Overlords, I don’t.
So give me your thoughts. Coy... are my Overlords after you? Wtf derp?
Wouldn't surprise me if this were true. You are quite the pawn.
i am a pawn
Please tell me derp so I can break free.
Who are my Overlords and why is Oklahoma doing the Lord’s work?
Just tell me for gosh sakes, or am I unsaved and unsavable
Even the CDC says they don't know. With that as current stance, why is it safer to vaccinate a person not likely to get COVID and far less likely to have any serious symptoms from it while the vaccine is not risk free?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
