Reply With Quote
yep. "even" liz cheney who has been a vocal opponent of the "stolen election" crap still supports the suppression laws.
they still want trumpism but while distancing themselves from trump
Anyway I have no evidence that all Republicans don't support voter suppression, since I have yet to see a single one express any opposition.
yep. "even" liz cheney who has been a vocal opponent of the "stolen election" crap still supports the suppression laws.
they still want trumpism but while distancing themselves from trump
hater really hates US democracy
Heard a few Repugs talk about forming a 3rd party.
Most seem to want to continue their illicit fund flow so cow tow to tRumpler and his brainwashed followers.
seems hater hates Americans generically. he seems to respect certain asshole strongmen though.
Full stop
#blue
#bluen
Theres no reason not to investigate
You're having a lot of trouble explaining your Republican voter suppression schemes, hater.Full stop
#blue
Why?
Nope I dont care about that or republi s. Most politicians are snakes on both sides.
I just laugh at your blueanon theory and your full stop
Nope I dont care about that or republi s. Most politicians are snakes on both sides.
I just laugh at your blueanon theory and your full stop
Full stop.
To be fair, limiting people to voting only once can be labeled "suppression".
Who voted twice?
Be specific.
swing and a miss
Do you consider asking for an ID to vote to be "suppression"?
Eyup.keep them distracted with nonsense like critical race theory and trans bathrooms
A poll tax is a poll tax, no matter how you phrase it.
Why is this such a hard concept for you? You are fairly bright, otherwise.
No, it can't.
Yep, make whatever government ID you want to require free and easily obtainable.
Now CC can address all his party's suppression schemes.
Poll Taxes
Begun in the 1890s as a legal way to keep African Americans from voting in southern states, poll taxes were essentially a voting fee. Eligible voters were required to pay their poll tax before they could cast a ballot. A “grandfather clause” excused some poor whites from payment if they had an ancestor who voted before the Civil War, but there were no exemptions for African Americans.[ID that costs money]
Begun in the 1900s as a legal way to keep African Americans from voting in southern states, [IDs that cost money] were essentially a voting fee. Eligible voters were required to pay [the fees required for the ID] before they could cast a ballot.
No.
"vote more than once" myth
It's certainly on the lower end of the spectrum, but unless those ID's are provided for free and without transportation or any other requirement other than being eligible to vote, then yes.
We shouldn't be allowing the state to set requirements that they can control or restrict through access or cost.
But I'm more concerned with the reduction of polling places in demographically specific precincts, reduction of early voting, removal of eligible voters from registries, and the other plainly obvious voter suppression tactics currently happening under Republican legislatures.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
