Reply With Quote
become?
He's been south of the reservation since inception.
I bet he will. All he has to do is bump where it was already addressed just upstreampgardn won't address det one
become?
He's been south of the reservation since inception.
Now, they can do nothing else but bum rush the CDC into sanctifying the vaccines, Winester...
First day this week the official CDC approval would be right after the first of the year.
Second day this week the official CDC approval would be in a few months.
Third day this week the official CDC approval would be in September.
This morning on CNN Fauci says the official CDC approval will at the end of this month, or, early in August. tee, hee.
See, mother er Biden will wait till the CDC stamps them all, all the vaccines with the seal of approval and if we still balk at getting shot then,,,he'll mandate them, or, at least try and then all will break loose.
C'mon, Joe, come get some, you , you.
down here the delta variant is making a run for the masses, fkn state i live in is in lockdown again, could be extended for a couple of weeks or months just to get the numbers down under control...due to one state being incompetent not shutting down and letting people roam during the holiday season just to keep the economy kicking, im still havnt gotten vacinnated....its always the same fkn ethnic race minority starting the spread when everything is under control, fkn chinese dogs and indian s
shut down doesnt effect me, i work in fcmg, australia needs to eat, didnt get any day/shift breaks last 6 months cause i was a casual and now promoted to full time...work work work like that grunt npc in warcraft2..
It was 170.
Whoopsie.
Where’d you hear that?
Influential Ivermectin Study Accused of 'Totally Faked' Data
"The efficacy of a drug being promoted by rightwing figures worldwide for treating Covid-19 is in serious doubt," reports the Guardian, "after a major study suggesting the treatment is effective against the virus was withdrawn due to 'ethical concerns'." The preprint study on the efficacy and safety of ivermectin — a drug used against parasites such as worms and headlice — in treating Covid-19, led by Dr Ahmed Elgazzar from Benha University in Egypt, was published on the Research Square website in November. It claimed to be a randomised control trial, a type of study crucial in medicine because it is considered to provide the most reliable evidence on the effectiveness of interventions due to the minimal risk of confounding factors influencing the results...
A medical student in London, Jack Lawrence, was among the first to identify serious concerns about the paper, leading to the retraction... He found the introduction section of the paper appeared to have been almost entirely plagiarised. It appeared that the authors had run entire paragraphs from press releases and websites about ivermectin and Covid-19 through a thesaurus to change key words. "Humorously, this led to them changing 'severe acute respiratory syndrome' to 'extreme intense respiratory syndrome' on one occasion," Lawrence said.
The data also looked su ious to Lawrence... "In their paper, the authors claim that four out of 100 patients died in their standard treatment group for mild and moderate Covid-19," Lawrence said. "According to the original data, the number was 0, the same as the ivermectin treatment group. In their ivermectin treatment group for severe Covid-19, the authors claim two patients died, but the number in their raw data is four..." Lawrence contacted an Australian chronic disease epidemiologist from the University of Wollongong, Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, and a data analyst affiliated with Linnaeus University in Sweden who reviews scientific papers for errors, Nick Brown, for help analysing the data and study results more thoroughly... "The main error is that at least 79 of the patient records are obvious clones of other records," Brown told the Guardian. "It's certainly the hardest to explain away as innocent error, especially since the clones aren't even pure copies. There are signs that they have tried to change one or two fields to make them look more natural..."
Meyerowitz-Katz told the Guardian that "this is one of the biggest ivermectin studies out there", and it appeared to him the data was "just totally faked".
Meta-analyses relying on the "just totally faked" data were then published in Oxford Academic's Open Forum Infectious Diseases and in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Meanwhile, the Guardian also notes a new (and peer-reviewed) paper that was just published last month in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. Its finding? Iermectin is "not a viable option to treat COVID-19 patients".
chump addressed it you ancient nag.pgardn won't address det one
And oh wise one, one person in a nursing home can give it to other people in a nursing home ALL OF WHOM are more likely to have bad symptoms. (So the 65 and over age GROUP was targeted)
I wont address it because I live a life outside of computer and did not get to it within YOUR time limit... fkn dumb old fart.
Me, myself and I crowd showing their stupidity.
Wake up. We live together, we share the same air and viruses in densely populated areas and enclosed spaces.
o D mcfly.
Why do child care facilities require vaccines and dont let your child in if they are not vaccinated fat head? They show you the door, thats how much they care about your child as an individual.
Last edited by pgardn; 07-17-2021 at 09:54 PM.
Says the guy who writes for Popular Science.become?
He's been south of the reservation since inception.
Lying is your thing.
Canada was close to allowing access to their country for twice vaccinated individuals from the US who wanted to vacation.
Was this like a door prize for those of us who have been vaccinated because they are so very happy WE wont get the disease? Or was it to protect the spread of viral variants into their country?( Because they clearly could use our tourist money)
No. We vaccinate to protect the individual.
Vaccines lower your chance of spreading disease.
Some people in your family or community may not be able to get certain vaccines due to their age or health condition. They rely on you to help prevent the spread of disease. Infants, older adults, and people with weakened immune systems (like those undergoing cancer treatment) are especially vulnerable to infectious disease. For example, newborn babies are too young to be vaccinated against whooping cough. Unfortunately, whooping cough can be very dangerous or even deadly for them. Pregnant women should get the Tdap vaccine during every pregnancy to help protect their babies fromw hooping cough. Anyone who is around babies should be up to date with their whooping cough vaccine.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/adults/...vaccinate.html
1 You are on the front lines
and risk being exposed to
people with COVID-19 each
day on the job.
2 Protecting you also helps
protect your patients and
your family, especially
those who may be at higher
risk for severe illness from
COVID-19.
3 You matter. And you play
an essential role in keeping
your community healthy.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-1...accination.pdf
Thou shalt not covet
So you're saying people should get vaccinated to protect those who refuse to get vaccinated.
Not "should", dip but it's certainly turning out that way. Think of it as an actual way to feel superior to them. That's all that's important to you.
your necropolitical stakes below -->
yep, a lot of morons in my country too.
No.
You said that.
There are people are not yet vaccinated and or CANNOT get vaccinated numbskull.
And if you had a clue as to populations, you would understand why not getting a large portion of the population vaccinated, leads to evolution, through natural selection and random variations, possible nastier variants.
Mr. Popular Science... liar
What was the subject of your published article?
This is fun again.
DMCnoevil busts into an argument with no back ground and the arbiter of the middle ground, the removed unbiased expert observer by his own accord, gets slapped around again. Please come climb another tree you cannot get down from old man..
Last edited by pgardn; 07-18-2021 at 10:01 AM.
You are as stupid as you are stubborn.
congrats.
Darrin forgot about the concept of herd immunity
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
