Reply With Quote
Okay, be a hard ass then. I'm deeply disappointed in you, JK. I thought you walked tall. I was mistaken.Caught what? Looking at his watch?OH NOES!! HOW DISGRACEFUL!!!
Okay, be a hard ass then. I'm deeply disappointed in you, JK. I thought you walked tall. I was mistaken.Caught what? Looking at his watch?
They never learn.
Why would dogs from the Kabul small animal shelter be sitting in front of a blackhawk helicopter at the airport?
The photo in the tweet is not the same as the photos they are talking about.
Qchrisy with the lies, again, just how he was raised.
His mom probably tells him she loves him too.
the photo in the tweet is from 2017. the photos making rounds on social media are from the animal shelter
rubes
Well duh. The one they are talking about is a bunch of cages in front of a blackhawk helicopter.
and those werent US military animals
people probably shouldnt get their news/takes from James Woods and Ian Miles Cheong
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rt/5664405001/
On Aug. 27, Kabul Small Animal Rescue, an animal welfare group that has tended to animals injured or displaced during the war in Afghanistan, posted on Twitter that it was trying to evacuate animals in the cargo hold of planes leaving Kabul's airport.
The animals were being flown out as part of the group's "Operation Hercules," a crowdfunded effort in the country. That work had been going on days before the viral images began circulating.
An older social media post from the group described the animals as "dogs and cats left behind as people flee" in Kabul. It made no mention about the animals being service animals or contracted to work with the U.S. military.
Someone posted the viral photo with the unverified claim that they were military dogs, alt-right disinfo provocateurs exploited it, and Republican Senators fell for it (or knowingly piggy-backed on the disinfo to score partisan points, more likely)."Photos circulating online were animals under the care of the Kabul Small Animal Rescue, not dogs under the care of the U.S. military. Despite an ongoing complicated and dangerous retrograde mission, U.S. forces went to great lengths to assist the Kabul Small Animal Rescue as much as possible," Pahon said.
Or Ron Filipkowski
who actually linked to an article... rather than just posting a photo and narrating over itOr Ron Filipkowski
idgaf what flipkowski says, you doofus. he actually provides a citation which is what matters
It's not about being right or wrong, it's about flinging mud.
Despite being consistently and overwhelmingly wrong on just about everything they post, people continue to go back to them because that's where the mud is at. The truth is less interesting.
The US must re-invade Afghanistan to rescue muh imaginary Army dogs!
empty cages
called it!
(unlike comrade Hater)
So we're supposed to make life and death policy decisions based on the judgement of clowns who got duped by a 4 year photo of an animal shelter?
PATHETIC!!!
True.
Also true morons who get duped about Russian hookers pissing on Orange Bas are not much better
Well... Well... Well... It's a good thing daboom isn't making policy OR operational decisions for us.
Sorry, hater. You came in prefolded on this deflection attempt.True.
Also true morons who get duped about Russian hookers pissing on Orange Bas are not much better
No, that probably did happen. We can't verify that's it's NOT true.True.
Also true morons who get duped about Russian hookers pissing on Orange Bas are not much better
DP
Last edited by DMX7; 08-31-2021 at 04:46 PM.
Or Ron Filipkowski
Owning the libs as a cult.
No lie too outrageous, no half-truth too misleading, no forwarded email too ridiculous.
The commitment to dishonesty is breathtaking to behold sometimes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
