You've never liked me, bene, for any length of time. Christ, one minute I'm in, the next minute I'm out. In & out---In & out. You're a good time Charlie, bene.
Christ, and I put my signature on your behalf a fortnight ago and now you stab me in the back a day before Friday, bum.
You're a little better than bene thru the years, but not much, bum, and what [better] you are is fleeting. Christ, one minute I'm in. The next minute I'm out. In & out---In & out.
C'mon cubby, you were spamming 6 and second fifth for years
Yeah, but it's not your place to call me on the carpet about it, GD, it!!! That would be bouts, or, the Dumper's place, not your's, or, bene's.
In the sage words of "Sheriff Andy Taylor"---"Act like somebody."
Quantify the damage. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.
He's in overload now though. President Biden pushed him over the edge
Perhaps.
It is a good question. should bannon be locked up immediately? "lock him up"?
executive has already waived privilege.
Indeed. I don't deny my temper, my . I respond to triggers here just like the next asshole in the line. And the Winester triggers me something fearsome, i.e., I come in here from the TV in a good humor, read one of his ing posts and I grab some jacks & timbers and start back down. That's my way.
I don't pull that of..."I'm not going to let him see that he bothers me. I'll just keep posting in regularity."
No, I take a fit on-the-spot and meet him on the square...and post that I believe bugs him/others in the group.
That's my way. To change now would be an affront not only to myself, but to the rest of the group.
The absolute worst. I lose brain cells reading that patronizing .
You got little room to complain, Adam. You ain't no picnic.
Feels like another good opportunity to mention that I also have Dale on ignore.
good idea
No, it's not a good question and no there's absolutely zero legal grounds to "lock him up" immediately.
It's really a a terrible post to get dumb people like bouts aroused.
Sometimes (yes,) and sometimes (no). You're another one who can't make their mind up. Why? Simple, because you're afraid.
That's what you'll/we'll have to do in order to lodge the issue into the courts. He'll be released on bond immediately and the clock will start.
President Trump didn't go to all the time and trouble of stacking that SC just to let a situation like this to be wasted.
Go ahead, RG...
Chop/chop.
Trillions of dollars in property damage and business losses due to theft of goods, destruction of property
Hundreds to thousands of businesses nationwide victims of vandalism, shoplifting, looting
Double-digit lives lost, about half of which were minorities; but that's irrelevant.
Blue mayors and governors not enforcing their own mask and social distancing mandates on the rioters all of last summer, May-September 2020.
Link?Quantify the damage. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.
Source?
He spams and you stalk...
what is the sound of one idiot discovering he has been duped by propaganda?
Now, your turn to quantify the "damage" from January 6th...
A few selfies, zero property damage, a podium temporarily confiscated but returned. One US Citizen murdered by feds. Zero officials or others killed. Zero congressmen/senators injured.
That is not a link, nor is it a source.Quantify the damage [from the 2020 george floyd protests]. if it was so vast, it should be easy to do.
You claimed "trillions in dollars of damages".
I would like to see some evidence of this claim. Your assertion, your burden of proof.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 10-14-2021 at 04:27 PM. Reason: principle one.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/...rance-forever/Trillions.
Approximatly 2bn, per an industry tally as of Feb of this year, although it is not well sourced.
So "trillions" was an exaggeration by four orders of magnitude.
Right-wing propaganda sure made it seem like the entire country was burning to the ground. This... is a modest hurricane spread over a nation of 330M and with a GDP of roughly 21Tn
https://news.yahoo.com/january-6-com...182300493.htmlThe Jan. 6 Select Committee announced that it will hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt after the former Trump chief of staff failed to show up for a deposition.
"Mr. Bannon has declined to cooperate with the Select Committee and is instead hiding behind the former President's insufficient, blanket, and vague statements regarding privileges he has purported to invoke," said Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson in a press statement. "We reject his position entirely. The Select Committee will not tolerate defiance of our subpoenas, so we must move forward with proceedings to refer Mr. Bannon for criminal contempt."
Criminal contempt would seem to be grounds. The question was, therefore, a valid one.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 10-14-2021 at 05:01 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
