Page 17 of 20 FirstFirst ... 71314151617181920 LastLast
Results 401 to 425 of 483
  1. #401
    Veteran james evans's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    5,780
    Forbes is bad....But our starting point guard is shooting under 10 percent from the 3 point line in 3 games....Thats unacceptable...Hes gonna be a big reason why we lose alot of games unless he picks it up
    I often wonder what Murray does in the offseason because his 3 point shoot has never been consistent.

  2. #402
    One TEAM One Goal siraulo23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    5,795
    imagine if the spurs didnt sign Forbes, maybe Primo or Tre would be getting a couple mins here and there in the rotation

  3. #403
    OH YOU LIKE IT!!! slick'81's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    18,493
    imagine if the spurs didnt sign Forbes, maybe Primo or Tre would be getting a couple mins here and there in the rotation
    I mean bryn has literally 3 points n 3 games lulz

  4. #404
    Veteran emanueldavidginobili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    5,151
    I often wonder what Murray does in the offseason because his 3 point shoot has never been consistent.
    He has literally improved each and every season, what're you smoking? lmao.

  5. #405
    Believe. Scrooge McHolt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10
    imagine if the spurs didnt sign Forbes, maybe Primo or Tre would be getting a couple mins here and there in the rotation
    But then who would pop get ripped on expensive wine with on road trips?

  6. #406
    Unstoppable TDomination's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    5,095
    My pointless thoughts

    -back to back 20+ forced TO's is wonderful! If this current team is able to put it together to make a playoff push it will be because of this, defense.
    -No quit. This team was on the verge of being blown out several times but kept fighting back until the very very end. With a young team i think this is huge.
    -I dont know about anyone else but i am pumped even after back to back losses. This team is exciting to watch due to their hustle, tenacity, swarming and energy. Hopefully it translate to wins but even so i personally enjoy watching them.
    -Forbes...cmon man
    -Primo needs to replace the F man.

  7. #407
    Unstoppable TDomination's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    5,095
    Forbes through 3 games 30 minutes 1-10 3 points.... Primo 2 games 5 minutes 2-2 5 points LMAO
    this is a no brainer on who should be getting the minutes...or so you would think.

  8. #408
    Unstoppable TDomination's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    5,095
    Primo did more in 40 seconds than Forbes in 3 games. Defended Middleton well and then flys in for the tip in. When will Flopovich realize this kid needs minutes?
    yup pretty much this. Primo has showed it more than 1 time but man just seeing this in a game that was beyond over, getting 2 points that don't matter, hustling to the basket for a tip in that means nothing and yet does it anyways. dude has fire

  9. #409
    Veteran spurs1990's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    4,165
    Pop needs to clog his memory back 20 years and redo a Primo Frobes swap like he did with Parker Daniels.

    Not that Forbes is in the same stratosphere of skill as Antonio Daniels

  10. #410
    Unstoppable TDomination's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    5,095
    As #TeamTank, I'm loving these entertaining losses tbh
    im definitely not on team tank but i am loving these games even though they end in losses.

  11. #411
    Emperor Duncan>>>>>King James tim_duncan_fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    3,964
    What were you watching, bro? They attacked the basket plenty. Unfortunately, Giannis altered many shots at the rim tonight and made it ugly.
    My gut reaction is that we didn't have enough penetration and we were just a bit slow to get shots up in general. Too much hesitation and passing up good looks.

    I kept thinking "shoot the ing ball". To me, we are too slow and plodding even when one of the defenders is taking his time to get back on defense after we rebound. They have to be quicker and more aggressive. I see timidity and a lack of natural fluidity on the offensive side of the ball. The opposing defense does not have to move enough. We missed some shots but we just flat didn't take some as well and took some late. I saw a lot of standing around and floating along the perimeter, moving the ball to the next guy hoping they try to attack instead. More aggression is needed. They are way too unsure of what to do with the ball, other than they know they want to pass to Jakob and hope he sees something. I assume this will get fixed over time, but right now we are holding teams down the best we can defensively; we have to apply more pressure offensively. Better and quicker decisions. I saw multiple times tonight where a Spur has an angle on his defender or can actually almost turn the corner on him completely but they are so hesitant that the opening closes. Thinking about 3s instead of just putting the shot up, or worse dribbling out of the open 3. Just little clock-burning stuff that Tony would have nipped in the bud a full second and a half earlier. They are thinking too slowly, in my opinion. I don't know anything really or I'd be coaching but this is how things look to me.

    We are not making things hard enough on the opposing defense. I'd give Primo some of Forbes minutes and let him put some shots up, make some nifty passes.

  12. #412
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    so you want to target a guy that can't shoot at all and put him on a team that needs shooting?
    Because simmons is far better

  13. #413
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    What? Because they lost two tough back to back games against arguably two of the best 5 teams in the league? In which they competed for 4 quarters.
    The Murray and White backcourt had like two full seasons of data that it doesn't work.

  14. #414
    Veteran emanueldavidginobili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    5,151
    The Murray and White backcourt had like two full seasons of data that it doesn't work.
    So what is an a better alternative?

  15. #415
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    The Murray and White backcourt had like two full seasons of data that it doesn't work.
    No we don't. And right now this back court is working pretty ing well on the defensive end.

    2 seasons? The ?

  16. #416
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Spurs lost tonight because they weren't the team with Gianni's and because of the 3 point line. I think the shooting will pick up some. These first 6 games are going to be rough. Hope they steal one of the next two.

  17. #417
    OH YOU LIKE IT!!! slick'81's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    18,493
    Because simmons is far better
    Tell us more

  18. #418
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    So what is an a better alternative?
    Without a trade? White benched to reduce time minutes shared, which is a bandage solution.

  19. #419
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    No we don't. And right now this back court is working pretty ing well on the defensive end.

    2 seasons? The ?
    Yes.

  20. #420
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Spurs were 10-39 from 3. Take away McDermott and they were 3-28! The team doesn't have pure shooters but theyre not going to have many 3-28 nights.

    That's the difference in the game tonight.

  21. #421
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    We don't even have one season with that backcourt.

  22. #422
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    5,544
    This is exactly what we should all want. A compe ive/fun team that ends up losing enough games down stretch because it doesn’t have the offensive horses. Figure out who the keepers are, get value for the other guys, and get a key piece in the draft.

    It’s one thing to lose 50ish games and be going through the motions. This team is not doing that.

  23. #423
    I want some NASTY! SpurPadre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    14,324
    He should be get that least 10 minutes every game with chances for more if he’s playing well and or has a hot hand. This team needs talent. Spurs have a lottery pick and have him benched behind Forbes.just doesn’t make sense.
    Yeah, I wish Pop would give him the TP treatment and let him do trial by fire. But for whatever reason, that doesn't look to be in the cards, at least for the first couple of months.

  24. #424
    ..... stephen jackson's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    1,171
    We suck

  25. #425
    Emperor Duncan>>>>>King James tim_duncan_fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    3,964
    This is exactly what we should all want. A compe ive/fun team that ends up losing enough games down stretch because it doesn’t have the offensive horses. Figure out who the keepers are, get value for the other guys, and get a key piece in the draft.

    It’s one thing to lose 50ish games and be going through the motions. This team is not doing that.
    I was A-OK with full tank-style losing until they showed the defense could be like this. Now a couple of guys should just give us the extra 10 points we need to win lolol

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •