
Just last month you said this:
So when I do talk about you not clarifying things are your opinion, it's due to you saying often that something isn't your opinion. You should be able to click on the quote for context, but it was about you believing that winning more games was objectively bad because of it could lead to worse lottery odds, and my critique was that lottery odds having more value than performance was your opinion rather than a fact.
I think the Spurs should treat Johnson as their PF until he shows he can consistently play the three. Does that make sense?