Get dunked on![]()
Haven't followed this trial at all but what reason would they have had to attack him if he wasn't carrying that gun?
Get dunked on![]()
Just to be clear I'm legitimately trying to understand here, kyle riddenhouse just shot somebody so what was he supposed to do. A guy who just shot someone was running from the scene with a gun.
Almost certainly.
If Kyle was just walking around with a box of gauze, no one would have attacked him.
Do you think he actually said and/or typed this statement?
yes, he should have stayed home. but idk what he should have done when he was attacked? he tried to run away and they were going after him, so idk what else other than shoot, should he have done.
If you're a scared white guy, you definitely shoot in every situation. It's legal.![]()
He fled a crime scene and people tried to stop him. If anything this case showed me to not intervene if I see a crime.
He fled a crime scene and people tried to stop him. If anything this case showed me to not intervene if I see a crime.
You have to be a special kind of to advance on a guy with an AR-15 and not be armed yourself. And then even have a gun and still get shot.
Cool, sounds reasonable enough
Now do Ashli Babbitt.
oh okay so if there's an active shooter in your building you're a special kind of for trying to stop him unless you have a gun yourself
he had just shot someone, if someone shoots someone and you try to stop them are you in the wrong?
if you really as dark as you say you probably shouldn't be intervening anyway.
Odds aren’t in the unarmed person’s favor. Besides, at what point was Kyle an active shooter before he was being attacked? Im sure the “victims” were there purely for “racial justice” and not to just stir up .
the part where he just shot a guy a ran away. But i asked you a question are you a for trying to stop an active shooter who has an AR15 when you don't have a gun? Because that's what you said your words were "you're a to try and stop a guy with a gun" paraphrasing There's protocols that are taught in any gun course for when you shoot someone in self defense, to avoid the exact situation that happened, after his initial killing and he ignored all of them.
Black people have the privilege of self-defense, too. There was the case of the Black guy who shot at cops because they were firing non-lethal rounds out of an unmarked van. The Black guy got off, too.
i dont think anybody is fine with that. but that is not what was at issue in Rittenhouse's trial; whether Rosenbaum was a ty person
no. he had a bad criminal history. he already was convicted and served his time. doesnt mean its open season to go hunting people who had previously done bad things and did their time''even bad people have a right not to get murdered* with impunity''
depends on how bad... I am happy for every single pedo to be killed. in the most horrendous way if possible.
sometimes to stop an active shooting you just need a good guy with a skateboard
rent free
He attacked Kyle with a skateboard. Kyle fired 8 shots. All 8 were aimed at people who attacked him first. The idiot with a skateboard only had himself to blame for trying to be a hero without knowing the facts.
The facts were rittenhouse just shot a guy and was running away with a hot gun. Are we not supposed to stop people who shoot someone else?
Speaking of "rent free"
https://nypost.com/2021/11/19/michel...red-from-espn/“There was a rumor that [LeBron] got you fired from ESPN,” Pierce said.
“He tried,” Beadle responded. “He did try to do that. I was like ‘I’m honored that I’m even on your mind. Thank you very much for that, sir. That’s a weird place for me to be.
I said it’s dumb to advance on someone with an AR-15 if you’re not armed yourself. Especially when said armed person has not fired upon anyone yet. What was the point of trying to attack Kyle in the first place?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)