Sounds like a poorly designed study, seems there was some motivated reasoning too.
Sounds like a poorly designed study, seems there was some motivated reasoning too.
Science bad now
bad science always bad
- "A piece of gauze proved worthless."
- a 100 years ago
Nothing scientific about it, they're economists, not health experts... didn't need a study to figure out lockdowns are bad for the economy.
This is like calling a plumber when when you have a tooth ache.
Hard to blame them tbh...most of the proudly ignorant have absolutely no clue what goes into a scientific study and have zero idea how its internal and external validity is measured. lack of education is a big problem imho
A lockdown has to be even handed. (Ours) never came close. There were a slew of exceptions and excuses insistently, consequently it failed. There was never any other outcome possible.
...The next time you have an (ho) will be first time, Lee. You always have your nose in the air, talking down to us.
If a health emergency requires a lockdown, then it has to be a lockdown. It's understood it's a temporary measure.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)