^ what a trash take by that BOS blogger.
But his take about wingspans sounds like something I’d read in this forum tbqh
If so, we’ll all need to start referring to them by last name. Landales given name isn’t Jock, it’s Josh, so there’s three of them now.
^ what a trash take by that BOS blogger.
But his take about wingspans sounds like something I’d read in this forum tbqh
Nah, this was not a disaster for Boston
I think this is one of the few trades where everyone did ok.
I really like DW, but this is a good move for him. I think he'll flourish being a third option and on a team whose time is now as opposed to 2 to 3 years down the road. Spurs get a good pick. Will they get someone better than White with that pick?, Statistically speaking probably not. But the Spurs need Stars, not more good players , and more picks increases the odds
Wow....what a true idiot...
Did Pop always put him in a spot to succeed? Of course not.
Refused to play him as a rookie when it was obvious that he was one of the 4 best guards on the team
Then after his second year where he finished the regular season great and pretty much was the reason they made the playoffs as the starter, be gets limited off the bench to 23 minutes a game because Pop refuses to give him time with Dejounte until covid
Then the next year for much of it he refused to stagger and play them apart, I guess because Mills had to get his.
Then as things this season weren't going great, and with several other guards to experiment with as starters like Vassell and Primo and Walker, Pop doesn't try White off the bench. Somehow Pop had no problem asking a hall of famer Manu to come off the bench for sandbaggers like Hero, Barry, Finley et Al but couldn't try White off the bench to get him going better and jumpstart one of the other players. The one time he came off the bench this year after missing games he was pretty good.
From the Boston writer....
If it helps you feel better, we'll throw in Lonnie as well.Gregg Popovich didn’t care about cutting bait to make way for Primo and Lonnie Walker.![]()
Yeah, he makes some decent points and it's a good sign a beat writer for the Celtics feels so strongly about assets that now belong to the Spurs.
But he apparently hasn't watched us much if he thinks Lonnie is our future
Not sure why the opinions of a Celtics blogger are being invalidated, the guy has watched more Celtics games than Spurs fans
He’s not really trashing Derrick White, he’s moreso saying Josh is better. And he’s en led to that opinion, it might end up even being true.
his primary concern is the 2028 FRP which is a legitimate concern. It’s very stupid for the Celtics to include that for Derrick White.
Don’t forget the 2028 FRP swap option. That might wind up being the best part of this trade.
If you closely read the first part, he basically says that the trade result is more nuanced, but he’s going to emulate old time print journalists with a one sided hit piece. That makes it fair game.
We came up but I still liked Derrick regardless.
One thing about White that has gone unappreciated is how he's one of the best pick and roll ball handlers in the league and managed that without ever playing with an above the rim big who could really go get it. Poeltl likes the ball low, and his other partners have been the likes of Pau, Aldridge, Eubanks, Joffrey, Dieng, Thaddeus, Trey Lyles and old Rudy Gay
Re: that Boston blogger: his post was better written than most things here. Lol. Probably overemphasized some key points, probably underestimated White’s defense (he DID have to guard wings sometimes), but yeah, makes me think that like the DDR trade, our GM did about as well as one could hope for given the situation. I’m thrilled. And he’s absolutely right about the injury history. White had an atypically injury free season this year. Also, his insight gives me more hope for Richardson and Langford. I did think it was a weird, bad move by boy genius Brad Stevens. That’s great.
Richardson doesn’t fit our timeline. He’s already on the market, and he hasn’t played a minute yet. He’ll be shopped during the draft, free agency, and next season. He’s a serviceable player who can shoot and defend on a decent deal. In other words, catnip to playoff teams. We should get a decent asset for him.
Langford will be given a shot to stick. He’s in the timeline, and has the toolset. There’s some chatter about his motor/ethic on Twitter, but Pop will sort that out one way or the other. As strong defender with a decent 3 pointer, he can always be flipped next year, too.
This whole timeline thing is overblown
the Wolves aren’t rushing to get rid of KAT because he’s 26 and because that team isn’t yet compe ive
The Wizards can continue to surround 28 year old Beal with players and look to compete. They tried to do that this past offseason.
older players have a place on any team. Especially if that role isn’t a primary one.
A team doesn’t have to be filled with prepubescent teenagers to fit any timeline.
Rebuilding teams need assets, and the best way to get those is to trade experienced players for youth and picks from playoff teams. I can think of two clear cases of the reverse, when playoff teams should have traded their picks. The first one should be familiar: Boston, and pick #14 in 2019, Romeo Langford. They were a deep playoff team, and didn’t have time or minutes to develop a young wing player. Second case, same as the first: Phoenix and pick #10 in 2020, Jalen Smith. He was buried 4th on their center depth chart as a rookie until Saric was injured during the playoffs.
Veteran players tend to want more money, which also interferes with paying the young players, and preserving cap room for rentals to accrue assets.
Yeah, I agree with that. For me, I think it’s less about age/timeline but fit, meaning can they accept and fulfill the role Pop has in mind, which may be to complement our younger players. Maybe Richardson motivates Vassel or Primo to play harder. Really hard for me to predict at this point. But yeah, Langford/Richardson could also easily be traded. The rest of the season will be interesting.
lmao what
This is insane. Pop bent overbackwards to enable Derrick. Derrick is good, but there's no need to completely rewrite history to one where Pop did anything but constantly support this dude and put him in places to succeed.
What can really be overrated is the age expectations of a great team. The '96 Bulls that went 72-10 and won a championship started five players that were 34, 32, 32, 30, & 27... and the 27 year old was the least consequential player of the bunch.
White =! Beal and KAT but also both those teams are pretty bad at rebuilding so I'm not sure you want to use them as examples.
The timeline is the timeline. It isn’t always young, and in fact, with contenders, it almost never is. Our Chip squads were usually among the oldest in the league.
Anyone like this Boston blogger looking at Derrick White and declaring him "unathletic" is falling victim to the shortcomings of the eye test. His objective draft combine numbers were excellent.
That 2028 pick swap is really incredible. Tatum has a player option in 2026. If he decides to leave, the Celtics could easily be in rebuild mode come 2028. Kudos to Brad Stevens for identifying White as a non-glamor player who can legitimately make the Celtics better, but that pick swap is a crazy risk to take as a GM.
If the GM thinks he'll be around in 2028 . . .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)