Nothing there is a personal attack. It's a fact. If you feel that's a personal attack then you should be doing everything in your power to relocate your family. You're the one saying the area you chose to live and raise your family is a dystopian hole. It's your thread, Sherlock.
The chart you showed has Wyoming at 37. I told you this once already you ing dummy, but you skimmed over it while trying to cipher.That is neither a testable hypothesis, nor any suggested metrics for well-being to test for dystopian holes.
Nor does it explain how those bad black people are skewing wyomings IMR.
So much fail. You. Suck. So. Bad. At. This.
https://www.kff.org/other/state-indi...:%22desc%22%7D
This is from your link.
Oh lookie at the black population concentration by state. Odd how these same states have the highest black population AND the highest IMR.
Yeah that makes no sense to a real mathematician.
So why would Delaware and Maryland be stuck in there? Oh I know, they too have a high IMR
And Blacks in Mississippi don't have the highest IMR in the country. Not even close.
Last edited by DMC; 02-16-2022 at 11:42 PM.
For these states, race population size does matter.Black life expectancy is still the same. Population doesn't matter here, idiot
The point isn't to show who's better or worse here as far as states, but the disparity between black and white life expectancies. If you're going to advertise your life expectancy numbers, and you're not ing out the disparity, you're only advertising to whites.
They have a history of bad data, especially of mortality of races other than white. See infant mortality N/As for these states by race below:
https://www.kff.org/other/state-indi...2:%22asc%22%7D
A 2013-14 ranking with better life expectancy data for African Americans shows a different picture. Am listing top states where African American life expectancy is 75 or better (i.e., at least 1/2 a year close to the overall average life expectancy of African Americans in US - 75.54). Note this ranking only has 37 states and DC because data fidelity issues associated with those missing states.
LIFE EXPECTANCY
AFRICAN AMERICAN
State---Years
1.Minnesota---79.72
2.Massachusetts---78.81
3.Connecticut---77.78
4.Washington---77.53
5.New York---77.42
6.Oregon---77.20
7.Colorado---76.68
8.Arizona---76.46
9.Nevada---75.91
10.Florida---75.84
11.New Jersey---75.49
12.Maryland---75.48
13.Delaware---75.40
14.Iowa---75.28
15.Virginia---75.28
16.California---75.08
With exception of DC, states with higher African American longevity are blue states. Red states were at bottom on longevity for African Americans. There was a 7 years longevity difference between lowest red state and highest blue state for African Americans.
https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/...rican-american
There is also date for white Americans.
Blue states also are good for white American longevity, red states, not so much (bottom 10 were red states).
LIFE EXPECTANCY
WHITE AMERICAN
State---Years
1. Wash DC---84.29 (Great to be rich and white in DC)
2. Minnesota---81.23
3. Connecticut---81.04
4. New York---80.47
5. South Dakota---80.44
6. Massachusetts---80.40
7. Hawaii---80.37
8. Vermont---80.35
9. Wisconsin---80.31
10. New Jersey---80.30
11. Colorado---80.24
12. North Dakota---80.20
13. New Hampshire---80.15
14. Utah---80.10
15. Nebraska---79.99
16. California---79.83
Note that for white Americans that data includes 50 states plus DC. There was a 9 year longevity difference between lowest red state versus highest blue state for white Americans.
https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/...pectancy-white
As an aside, there is data in site on median state incomes. States that are at bottom median income list are red states.
Your argument:
RG is wrong when he says these red states do poorly on average. It is really the black people in these red states that do so poorly that is dragging down the average.
Let's roll with that.
Why are Republican led states so closely correlated to poor black well being. Do tell.
There ya are, RG; back to the RG I know and love.
RG
This false narrative you keep pushing has been debunked several times in this thread. You keep zooming right past it to repeat the same re ed, false claims.
Bad data has nothing to do with population. There are other sites that do have that information. Race is captured on birth and death certs, and somehow you were ok with Wyoming's data.
Too bad we're not in 2013-2014.A 2013-14 ranking with better life expectancy data for African Americans shows a different picture. Am listing top states where African American life expectancy is 75 or better (i.e., at least 1/2 a year close to the overall average life expectancy of African Americans in US - 75.54). Note this ranking only has 37 states and DC because data fidelity issues associated with those missing states.
LIFE EXPECTANCY
AFRICAN AMERICAN
State---Years
1.Minnesota---79.72
2.Massachusetts---78.81
3.Connecticut---77.78
4.Washington---77.53
5.New York---77.42
6.Oregon---77.20
7.Colorado---76.68
8.Arizona---76.46
9.Nevada---75.91
10.Florida---75.84
11.New Jersey---75.49
12.Maryland---75.48
13.Delaware---75.40
14.Iowa---75.28
15.Virginia---75.28
16.California---75.08
With exception of DC, states with higher African American longevity are blue states. Red states were at bottom on longevity for African Americans. There was a 7 years longevity difference between lowest red state and highest blue state for African Americans.
https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/...rican-american
There is also date for white Americans.
Blue states also are good for white American longevity, red states, not so much (bottom 10 were red states).
LIFE EXPECTANCY
WHITE AMERICAN
State---Years
1. Wash DC---84.29 (Great to be rich and white in DC) 16 year discrepancy between white and black life expectancy
2. Minnesota---81.23
3. Connecticut---81.04
4. New York---80.47
5. South Dakota---80.44
6. Massachusetts---80.40
7. Hawaii---80.37
8. Vermont---80.35
9. Wisconsin---80.31
10. New Jersey---80.30
11. Colorado---80.24
12. North Dakota---80.20
13. New Hampshire---80.15
14. Utah---80.10
15. Nebraska---79.99
16. California---79.83
Note that for white Americans that data includes 50 states plus DC. There was a 9 year longevity difference between lowest red state versus highest blue state for white Americans.
https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/...pectancy-white
As an aside, there is data in site on median state incomes. States that are at bottom median income list are red states.
Now look at disparities. The averages don't capture the inequalities and disparities. You see the greatest disparities are in the blue states, either by political design or by geographical and sociological outcome. RG wants to say these issues are political, but if that's true then politics in these blue states is only favoring the white man. In the red states, if it's ing people, it's ing all races.
Then clearly, and briefly explain how exactly anything I have posted has been debunked?
jesus ing christ on a stick you are worse than Cosmored.
The only thing missing is 99 posts about a flapping jacket.
You have in no way debunked a goddman thing. Saying you have done a thing is different than claiming you have done a thing.
explain clearly or admit you are talking out of your ass.
Bad data from these states matter.Bad data has nothing to do with population. There are other sites that do have that information. Race is captured on birth and death certs, and somehow you were ok with Wyoming's data.
Too bad we're not in 2013-2014.
Now look at disparities. The averages don't capture the inequalities and disparities. You see the greatest disparities are in the blue states, either by political design or by geographical and sociological outcome. RG wants to say these issues are political, but if that's true then politics in these blue states is only favoring the white man. In the red states, if it's ing people, it's ing all races.
If African American infant mortality information is not available, the average longevity of African Americans in the state will increase.
Plus, the chart you use has the average US male life expectancy at under 70 instead of 77.
You with the bad data, again.
that is exactly the point I have been making.
you.
dumb.
ass.
your red herring argument is pure sophistry.
Argument:
Red states suck, because they fail at many common measures of well-being.
DMC red herring:
WHAT ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE... ARGLE BARGLE... AVERAGES.... BARGLE BARGLE... IMR....
Topic A: Red states are bad for their residents.What does red herring mean? A red herring is a tool used in argument. The red herring fallacy causes a distraction in n argument that draws attention off-topic.
Because of this, a red herring is a type of logical fallacy. A red herring is a way for a speaker to win an argument by bringing up a matter that is irrelevant to the main issue.
Rough outline of a red herring:
Topic A is argued
Speaker brings up Topic B, irrelevant to Topic A
Topic A is either ignored or forgotten because Topic B takes precedence
DMC brings up Topic B, Black people suffer from increased infant mortality rates
smh.
In all but two of those states, both whites and blacks did worse than the national average, which is my point.
So let's overlay your graphic with control of the state government.
Control = majority of legislature, both houses, same metric as I used before for cross indexing.
Wisconsin R
Oklahoma R
Arkansas R
Iowa R
Indiana R
North Carolina R
Kansas R
South Carolina R
Tennessee R
Georgia R
Louisiana R
Florida R
Mississippi. R
Delaware D
Illinois D
white, black, whatever. Look for human misery... and there is almost a certainty that there are Republicans in charge of writing laws.
LMAO All RandomPussy and Effeminate-man do is REeEeEeEeeeeeEEeee!
Racial disparity isn't a "whatever".
In all but two of those states, both whites and blacks did worse than the national average, which is my point.
So let's overlay your graphic with control of the state government.
Control = majority of legislature, both houses, same metric as I used before for cross indexing.
Wisconsin R
Oklahoma R
Arkansas R
Iowa R
Indiana R
North Carolina R
Kansas R
South Carolina R
Tennessee R
Georgia R
Louisiana R
Florida R
Mississippi. R
Delaware D
Illinois D
white, black, whatever. Look for human misery... and there is almost a certainty that there are Republicans in charge of writing laws.
Pretty sure in all instances white men are writing the laws.
Which states did blacks do better than the national average?
None of these states are prisons. People are free to come and go. Blacks fare better in Southern states. You're focused only on whites. This is what I've said since the start. The most disgusting disparity is in DC, something you casually brush aside. You brush aside any dem controlled regions where blacks fare worse, because you're looking for whatever metric you can use to try for a "w" after your silly ass thread was started.
I didn't say whites fared worse, I said if they fared worse, then it's the same for all races. It's not discriminatory. Discrimination and inequality are hallmarks of this dystopian society you mentioned in the thread le.
You've made it abundantly clear that you couldn't give 2 s about black people. Stop the moral posturing as if you do. You're only trying to impress your white friends.
... and there is the point where it finally sinks in.white, black, whatever. Look for human misery... and there is almost a certainty that there are Republicans in charge of writing laws.
Red herring harder.
Since Mississippi became a U.S. state, it has had 64 governors, including 50 Democrats, 7 Republicans and 7 from other parties. ... 10 governors (David Holmes, Gerard Brandon, Charles Lynch, John A. Quitman, John J. Pettus, Adelbert Ames, John Marshall Stone, Theodore G.
Dems had the con the longest, not a lot of progress there.
There's human misery in northern states unless you consider black misery to be subhuman.... and there is the point where it finally sinks in.
Red herring harder.
I noticed you stopped talking about Wyoming
Can't even do cir stantial ad hominem right.
But hey, let's say that Texas was on the list.
Here is your logical fallacy, one you make all the ing time, because you are a moron:
Even if I chose to remain in a dystopian hole, it would still meet that defin-tion, and THEREFORE still almost certainly be a state run on failed Republican policies.
Texas is a red state. You can pretend it's not, but you cherry pick your moments to call the state red. Cherry picking is the 1st sign of non-scientific, bias and outcome driven "research".Can't even do cir stantial ad hominem right.
You're the one here defending your decision to live in Texas by saying Texas doesn't qualify as a red state. You obviously think the point has merit. I wasn't using the comment to prove or disprove your claim, only to say you don't actually believe it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
