Reply With Quote
Tari Eason a total non-factor vs Arkansas so far today after playing well against Ole Miss last night. He’s 1/6 for 2 pts halfway through the 2nd half.
Why are we spending so much time on prognosticating the FRP?
We all know the meltdown is going to happen over who we select in the second round.
Tari Eason a total non-factor vs Arkansas so far today after playing well against Ole Miss last night. He’s 1/6 for 2 pts halfway through the 2nd half.
Think the Spurs will seriously consider him in that 8-12 range in the draft if that’s where they end up, despite his inconsistencies.
There’s a chance he still goes in the late teens, which I think would be terrific value. I’m not sure the Spurs though, would be interested if they have to use a pick that high on a guy who’s motor reportedly fluctuates as much as his does considering his likely role, initially coming into the NBA.
In a normal draft, Eason seems like a #20-30 pick to me. Does anyone know why he comes off the bench? Is it a Manu thing, or is he really not who they want to start?
26-8-2-1-1, his stock is going to rise by the time the draft comes around.
All of a sudden I'm seeing a situation where they keep their first first pick and then trade both last 1st round two picks for something a bit higher to get a guy that intrigues them.
The problem is were not going to be able to move up that much and most teams won't do a trade with us
I’ve been really underwhelmed aswell. Looks like he has concrete feet on defense. Also looks like he’s gonna have a really below average standing reach for this height. Dudes neck is about a foot long. Poor rebounder too, at least from the advanced stats point of view.
Yeah I could see that. Hopefully that Rap’s pick conveys…
I think Murray will be in Tier 2 on a lot of NBA teams draft boards soon. He's already at the top of Tier 3 imo. He might even go 3rd behind Jabari and Chet.
The other problem is the teams that will likely pick in the 4-8 range all have needs for an athletic 4 who can also play some 3. Houston, Orlando and Detroit could all pick him 3rd imo. None of those teams have long term prospects at the 4 spot. Indiana and OKC also don't. Sacramento looks like they see Sabonis as a 5 long term, but they may take a more traditional wing over Murray if they see Sabonis as a 4. Portland literally has no prospects at the 4 spot.
Might be best for Spurs if Iowa gets eliminated early in the tournament lol.
I think his age will keep him from reaching the top 4.... 5 is probably his ceiling but more than likely he goes 5-7.... I know he looks great right now but age is a big deal at the top of the draft..
Schmitty obviously one of the best in the business but rarely throws around the ‘no fail’ label. High praise…
Spurs fall from 7th to 8th in the lottery with tonight’s win, and are only one game up on the Pelicans now. Only 2 games up on the tanking Knicks who lost tonight as well.
Spurs will take someone we've never heard of or expected that's two years away from being two years away tbh.
Big perfomance from Duren 21 PTS 20 RBS 2 AST 2 STL 2 BLOCKS, he starts to shoot . The body is huge for a 18 yrs old kid ( he'll not be 19 when the season starts).
If we are in the 8-11 range he could be the BPA left on the board..
Which player in the draft would be the best fit for our current roster? Smith? Holmgren? Banchero?
Doesn't matter. Spurs won’t have a shot at any of those guys.
Keegan Murray with another monster performance today. He’s not gonna be available when we select either.
32/9/3, including 8/10 from 3, in a buzzer-beating win over Indiana.
Keegan Murray might go top 5 by draft day if he keeps this up.
I'd say Smith, then Chet, then Banchero....if we can get the ping pongs balls to go our way...
I believe he can go #5 as well...i think 5-8 is his range...
I asl think there's a pretty big drop off after pick #8....
My top 8 are Smith, Chet, Banchero, Ivey, Sharpe, Murray, Duren, and Griffin ...in that order..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
