Reply With Quote
The good doctor Fauci...
POLITICS
Fauci's back and says lockdowns could be too
---------
They know something we don't know, do-dah, do-dah, they know something we don't know all the do-dah day.
The good doctor Fauci...
Europe is getting socked hard by the new variant so it's no mystery that USA is going to get socked also in a few weeks. Perhaps it will be the dominant strain
What are you getting for your next booster? Haven't kept track of the newer vaccines, tbh
Just live your lives, dip s
We are, dip
You've probably already had a natural booster, dip
I didn't so far, dip . What are you crying about, exactly? You seem to be upset that some people aren't scared of a needle and 10 mins of their time.
LOL Karrin so offended by people getting vaccinated
Vax to your hearts content.
Mask to your hearts content.
Wax your ass till your farts repent
Cry to your heart's content.
Whine to your heart's content.
Ivermectin cheerleaders like DarrinS and Snake Boy still think we should keep studying Ivermectin until their priors are confirmed.
Meanwhile, real world studies keep showing it doesn't do diddly .
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2789362
Austria reversed course on mask mandates two weeks after ditching them.
Well China has something like 40 million people on lock downs and everyone wears masks yet pretty much the new outbreak has infected most of there country. They are even coming to the conclusion that they are not going to be able to lock themselves out of this mess.
Statistical slight of hand makes the the risk "disappear"
Using a lagging indicator like hospitalization will tend to ensure public health guidance comes too late.
what a wild overstatement. typical for you, though.
Mild cases can experience cognitive impairment. Other studies have correlated decerebration -- loss of brain tissue.
"just a cold"
https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.w...1002/alz.126443.3 Cognitive functioning following COVID-19 recovery
The case-control studies reported mainly consistent results; all found significantly lower scores in cognition in the post-COVID-19 patient group compared to controls. Although some studies found deficits in global scores of screening measures23, 24 and sub-scores of attention, memory, and executive functions, others25 found deficits in only specific cognitive domains, principally attention. A study focusing on a young population (mean age 42.2 ± 14.3 years) reported cognitive impairment on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in COVID-19 patients, which did not correlate with neuropsychiatric symptoms or disease severity.26
Cohort studies showed a high occurrence of moderate cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 patients, exceeding 50% in all studies that reported prevalence,12, 15, 16, 27 ranging from 54% in a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to hospital with moderate COVID-1915 to 65% in a cohort of moderate to severe patients.27 A study16 on patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 (mean age 57, interquartile range [IQR] 49-67) reported that 58.7% met criteria for moderate neurocognitive impairment and 18.4% for severe neurocognitive impairment 2 months after discharge. Specifically, the cognitive domains mostly impaired were immediate verbal memory impairment (38% moderate, 11.2% severe) and semantic verbal fluency (34.6% moderate deficits and 8.4% severe). In addition, studies found cognitive deficits in verbal fluency, attention, executive functions, and delayed memory.12, 15,
That is one more study showing ivermectin works better than remdesivir, which Fauci called "the standard of care".
ICU admission in 2.5% in the ivermectin group vs 3.2% in the control group
Mechanical ventilation 1.7% in the ivermectin group vs 4.0% in the control group
Mortality 1.2% in the ivermectin group vs 4% in the control group
Better than Remdesivir
lol Fauci
Is the one of the studies you cited?
CLAIM: A recently published study shows that ivermectin is more effective than remdesivir in reducing mortality when treating COVID-19.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. The research detailed in the one-page abstract was not from a peer-reviewed study, nor was it a clinical trial. It relied on existing data from patient records and the full manuscript was withdrawn after the authors and reviewers found major flaws, including that the patients given ivermectin were on average younger and less sick than the hospitalized patients administered remdesivir. The researchers and experts told The Associated Press that the findings are no longer relevant.
THE FACTS: Social media users are misinterpreting a research paper abstract, falsely claiming its findings prove that the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19, and may be more effective than the approved antiviral medicine remdesivir.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-136056839408
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
