So there's no such thing as originalism.
Libs hate how our country is supposed to work. They want permanent one party rule from a centralized govt. They fantasize about it constantly on this forum.
So there's no such thing as originalism.
In practice, you would support such legislation in Texas.![]()
It's because they're all little authoritarian tyrants. They're literally the bullied wanting to play the bully. It'd be comical if it wasn't mainstream and in every ins ution.
Those guys are idiots. Every group seems to have a few right or left. Kind of like you rating high on the idiot list in here. Its your role in life.
You waited 1 minute
He didn't respond yet
chump
why are you lying about time?
amazing
How many minutes was it?
Be specific
More than one.
Why do you choose to lie about that?![]()
Not brave enough to answer![]()
Same people that want conservatives to continously denounce to prove themselves can't denounce extremists as anything but "passionate people".
You just broke the hypocrisy meter.
The one you can use braille to read.
imagine people of a political persuasion hoping that the party more closely aligning with them wins all the time
This is the saddest display of trying to seem coy and intelligent at the same time.
Lemme know when you’re prepared to do more than ask inane questions and post dictionary.com .
good thing the daily wire news twitter account cuts off the part where psaki said the president would want the justices' privacy to be respected and for any protests to be peaceful
I can. Posting home addresses crosses a line and whoever did so should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
You explain originalism as it pertains to his question.
AND THEN, he attempts to portray you as saying there is no such thing as originalism.
Pulls this kind of all the time.
Seriously?
When you're above the definition of words, you are above discussion. How can everything be the saddest this or that you ? Sack up and accept the term you used.
Fortune cookie!
I broke yours.
This is the dumbest ing attempt at a zen koan. Definitions matter. Case law matters more. Knowing the difference is what separates people who have something intelligent to say and ankle biters parading as a faux online sage like yourself.
Everything is sad, everything is dumb, you don't agree with the dictionary. What's it like waking up knowing you're above everyone else?
Why would I be parading as a fake sage? Wouldn't I be instead parading as a sage, since you basically used a redundant statement.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)