The Spurs ended last season with seven players who were rookies or sop res, and that's not counting Ca , who had 109 total minutes of NBA playing time the two previous seasons. But last year was an exception, right? No. The Spurs went into the season before with six rookies and sop res, which isn't counting Eubanks and his 45 games of playing time. The season before? Six.
The assumption that the Spurs would trade a first so they wouldn't compete with ing Wieskamp is lunacy. Could I see the Spurs stashing a pick or wanting their second-rounder to sign a two-way contract? Yes. Do I think the Spurs want to sign Wieskamp and the other two-way/former two-way players at least for camp? Yes. But do I think that's going to stop the Spurs from taking four rookies? Not at all. The Spurs need to find talent, not get stuck on any youngster who's worn a Spurs jersey recently. They have the room on their roster for six young players, and with their possible desire to use cap space, they might need young cheap players locked into long-term deals. There are four spots on the team that could use a developmental prospect. They don't have to address every spot right now, but they shouldn't hesitate to do so if there's a guy they like at their pick.
Murray, Jones
Primo, Richardson
Johnson, McDermott, Langford
Bates-Diop, Landale
Poeltl, Collins
That's the depth chart right now. That's 11/17 spots taken, with multiple occupied by guys who could easily be off the team. There are several potential RFAs on that list, but it's not a guarantee that any of them return, especially in lieu of a first-round pick at their position.

Reply With Quote
. I'm actually annoyed that I remembered Langford and not Devin.
