Nope, uh, uh. Given an inch you'd take the entire mile and then stand down there at mile's end skinnin' & grinnin'. No.
lol people in this thread who very obviously feel like they are light years more intelligent than ducks are using the exact same logic
Lmao you thought this was a good point. You're so ing stupid
Your new "war on guns" would just replace the failed "war on drugs" that put a disproportionate number of blacks and minorities in prison. You are nuts if you think there wouldn't be a backlash to your elitist plan.You honestly think that law would fail over discussions of "white privilege?"
Who do you think votes against gun control legislation?
Gotta start somewhere unless you're ok with the status quo. It's a perfect compromise actually. The left gets a reduction in mass shootings, the right gets more minorities in jail + "muh Chicago"
I don't know of a single leftist SJW type who is against gun control because of the degree to which it would disproportionally keep guns out of the hands of minorities. The types of people who would normally be loudest about "white privilege" are the ones who are loudest today about banning guns.
But even if you are right (you're not), I'd rather see leftist navel gazers ing on Twitter about gun criminals being locked up than see parents of 19 dead children having to identify their bodies at an elementary school.
...as long as their remains a decent proportionate of colored to white shooters I'll sustain.
Im not talking about criminals. Im talking about otherwise law abiding citizens that already have guns that couldnt afford splits new plan but wouldn't want to surrender their guns. You just turned productive citizens into criminals.
Start a charity then to provide assistance for lower income gun owners to meet the requirements. Or build financial assistance and fee forgiveness into the process.
Who buys them those $4000 a year insurance policies?
ducks could run for office in the 2022 Republican Party and win his primary.Lmao you thought this was a good point. You're so ing stupid
There are already low-income insurance solutions in every other situation where insurance is required.
I don't care where the money comes from. It's about the process.
Background checks, mental health programs, and gun insurance seem like obvious solutions that should gather support from the entire community, but apparently they are too expensive, discriminatory, and not 100% effective therefore it's better to just let people die at the hands of crazy people armed for battle..
You know, just like everywhere else where this doesn't happen
Alsoat the religion/family argument.. the left didn't topple any religion, they toppled themselves with their hypocrisy. Either way, regardless who destroyed what, those phenomena are not unique to the US the way mass shootings are
Laws are about process
The last two school shooters would have had subsidized guns with that plan because they didn't have criminal records and passed the Federal background check.
And then legally bought an AR
Guns and prayersBackground checks, mental health programs, and gun insurance seem like obvious solutions that should gather support from the entire community, but apparently they are too expensive, discriminatory, and not 100% effective therefore it's better to just let people die at the hands of crazy people armed for battle..
You know, just like everywhere else where this doesn't happen
Also
You're conflating the woman who owns a single hand gun for protection with small- preppers like DMC who feel the need to stockpile ARs in case of nuclear apocalypse. The single handgun owner who doesn't have a record and is mentally stable wouldn't be out more than a couple hundred bucks a year for the training and insurance. The Ramos' of the world wouldn't be able to afford to walk into a store on his 18th birthday and walk out with 2 ARs
How about the NRA
No one said anything about subsidizing their guns, and you don't know anything about what a background check would entail.
Also, they were both 18, so automatically disqualified by the age limit moving back to 21.
A primary debate between him and Herschel would be awesome
I'd have to take your word for it, I wouldn't put myself through watching that amount baffling mental re ation on display. Too depressing.
We should banish car insurance because it is discriminatory against ty drivers, and put the burden on the general population to pay for car accidents. Or make the victims GoFundMe.
How many millions of $$ is being spent right now on police, FBI, ATF, doctors, who knows what else as a result of what happened? Why should that burden be put on the taxpayer and not the gun owner via insurance?
you re-writing history does not fool anyone
the piece of sold out to our worst enemy and they held his hand and helped him into the oval office
none of your faux outrage or faux equivocation will ever change the facts
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
