Reply With Quote
Not Pedo, MAP. Get your lib terms right.
Voting rights for women or slaves weren't in the original cons ution either. Inter-racial marriage wasn't and still isn't codified in it either, but that's a long held cons utional right Uncle Thomas definitely won't touch.
Not Pedo, MAP. Get your lib terms right.
But the left only considers originalism when the 2A is mentioned, so I don't know where you're going with that.
Chumpy stumped pretty hard for the rights of Pedos. I feel you were getting there as well with "they have feelings too" bull .
when did chump or i ever suggest that they have a right to have sexual relations with children?
You both are trying to be on the front line, the tip of the spear for wokeness, by supporting child molesters because you think one day it will be the woke thing to do. Don't try to deny it. MAPs are people too, and if they don't act on their desire to a 4 year old bloody, then they should be treated like anyone else. However if someone ever comments on wanting a firearm, they need to be red flagged and denied the ability to ever own one.
damn, thats a lot of i disagree with and you will never find a post that hints otherwise
pretty creepy. guess you and koriwhat are in the same club
DMC definitely s children. He should've gotten help before he started ing children.
False.
You really are disgusting chump. You need to get outside and get off the keyboard.
You haven't read his accusations or you're just cheering him on.
I'm using his logic. Anyone who doesn't want to prevent pedos from acting on their pedo desires is probably part of a pedo ring himself.
You're projecting. I expected no less. Don't judge professed kiddie diddlers, but judge someone who despises them.
Show me where the left supports originalism.
Lol DMC found a new word again and has been dying to show it off
You interpret the Framers as having an issue with anything but muskets but I and many others don't. I'm sure the Framers would have a ball at the range with the arms we have these days.
As for abortion, can you point to it in the Cons ution for me?
Before you call me some Trump loving bigoted whatever, I don't care either way when it comes to the abortion issue. You do you though it's not my cup of joe.
You're the most hurt poster on the forum, and it's not even close.
BTW My last response wasn't actually geared towards you DMC. It was meant for those who keep claiming the Framers didn't have guns today in mind and wouldn't be cool with them which is nothing more than make believe and whatifs.
l like how angry tats liked this post
Start a thread about it and let's see where you and I finish in the hurt rankings
The problem with your post is what El Nono highlighted. The word "only". You have this thing with all or nothing scenarios. It's another reason you suck at debating.
I took your phrase to mean that originalism is the only thing they consider when it comes to the 2A. It's not the only thing they consider..
This is all pretty much 'make believe and whatifs'.You interpret the Framers as having an issue with anything but muskets but I and many others don't. I'm sure the Framers would have a ball at the range with the arms we have these days.
As for abortion, can you point to it in the Cons ution for me?
Before you call me some Trump loving bigoted whatever, I don't care either way when it comes to the abortion issue. You do you though it's not my cup of joe.
being in love with how they wrote it 248 years ago is stupid. you really couldn't improve on it in 250 years?
huh.
Sounds denso in the menso.
It's conspucuous to mention it for sure
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
