Reply With Quote
You're alright.
Those sound like your kinda people, you human genital wart.
You're alright.
You heard "short skirt", "death fetish" and went stalking this woman on social media. Do you really wonder why no one likes you and why everyone insults you no matter how much you try and blend in like the ing roach you are?
I bet your bathtub is ing filthy. I envision the greasiest, skeeviest, unkempt, socially awkward driving some kind of 3rd world bucket like a 2001 Daewoo or something sold in small quan ies on last-chance-credit-lots. You come off like you'd smell like period blood and mildew.
Prison rules. They don't tell the COs "It's your call, just depends on the cir stance" in CO academy where they learn to swab assholes for crack residue.
Fabbs, probably smells like cigarettes and liver cheese. Probably puts the cig between the middle and ring finger and blows smoke upward while staring at underage girls online.
Looks like they do. The CO did it anyways.
Look at the bright side, this guy was sent packing.
Not a fan of the death penalty, tbh... don't mean this particular guy didn't have it coming, but from the standpoint that incarceration is supposed to be a form of rehabilitation (debatable if it works that way at all), the death penalty feels like the State quitting.
Also, from a philosophical standpoint, it's a penalty with absolute finality. I'd like to see a higher standard for it. Over 20 people have been fully exonerated by new DNA evidence while being in death row, and obviously we don't know how many were killed before this was even a thing.
Fallible systems with final solutions don't make sense to me, tbh...
^ the finality, yeah is issue #1 with it.
Issue 2 is the cost effectiveness. Cheaper for a life sentence
That doesn't seem right. Housing someone for 10 years seems like it'd have to be way more expensive that killing them. If it's true, it means they're overspending on how they kill the prisoner. I still don't understand why a state wouldn't just shoot the person. And also not make it an event where everyone has to come in and watch. Also, I think if someone is sentenced for life, they should have the option of going straight to the death penalty.
As to the death penalty, I don't morally disagree with it. But if you're going to kill someone, the state needs to be 100% that they did the crime. I don't think we're anywhere near that. It really needs to be looked at on a case by case basis. It doesn't seem like there's so many people on death row that that's not an option on a state level. It's kind or ridiculous that it comes down to one person to grant a stay. And that person is probably too busy to put the necessary thought into it.
lol derp feels compelled to defend re ed alabama laws to own the libs of spurstalk
I understand the money equation, though the US as a whole murders ~20 inmates a year, so I'm not sure it really registers. Also, like I said, I just would like to see a higher standard of evidence for it (as SfS is pointing out as well).
On the 'show' of execution, this is normally done in front of family of victims, etc, in what, IMO, can only be described as State-sponsored revenge. It's pure savagery for the sake of making a politico look good, and I have serious doubts that actually watching the execution brings any more 'closure' than not watching it.
Death penalty vs. life in prison: The costs
An analysis by the office of the Tennessee comptroller found that the average cost of death penalty trials cost almost 50 percent more than both trials with life without parole and life with the possibility of parole
https://www.wbir.com/article/news/lo...s/51-581820292
This is specifically talking about the trials and not the cost of incarceration. The same article cites:
The execution of an inmate saves the state approximately $773,736 for the future
imprisonment of the inmate when compared to an inmate sentenced to life without
parole.Executions save $680,549 when compared to inmates sentenced to life with
the possibility of parole.
Yeah, I just threw that out while busy with other stuff. There's plenty of googling to find stuff on it. It's the court fees and the appeals that is expensive.
If there is no appeal, I'm guessing it's gonna be cheaper but what inmate doesn't appeal?
He's rehabilitated. He's never going to break another law.
Lame even for you
Blake has a grudge
Could you see her panties ?
I think some causes warrant it not all
However prison is suppose to be prison
Not a gym tv internet
Earning a degree online
Yuma territory prison was actually a prison
People who went there did not come back.
It was a prison !
Or you're just lameBlake has a grudge
Ducks is jealous of educated prisoners
The vast majority of people imprisoned will have to go back to society at some point, that’s why it always made sense that prisons also worked on rehabilitation to reinsert those people in civil society. That changed around the mid 70s though, and it became much more of a punishment system. There’s a good read about this here:
https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug03/rehab
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
