Not at all, that's the backpedalling I mentioned. When pressed, you changed your tune.
Again, nothing wrong with that. There's nothing wrong with shoring up a weak take, it's to your credit you weren't wedded to it.
Are you drinking again? I said they both should be prosecuted. I never said both should go to jail. I specifically said she should have gotten a Petraeus style probation and fine while Trumps was more egregious and I would have no problem with him going to jail.
I was not denying the destruction of emails came after the subpoena. I was 'quibbling about details on intent' as you put it, because that's what matters. She had admitted she deleted personal emails, using a service like Bleachbit to delete emails irrelevant to the investigation and immaterial to the intent.
Last edited by Th'Pusher; 08-30-2022 at 10:55 PM.
She had already sent the 30,000 work related emails to the State Department in December 2014.
under pressure, nuance emerged.
bravo
Patraeus' offenses were also worse than Clinton's. He actively stole and shared classified do ents with a person who had no clearance whatsoever.
who said I stopped?
dang
be careful what you wish for
unreal
Can't wait to see the spin attempts now.
"planted by the FBI even though it was already declassified by me and hey, give it back, that's mine!"
Can't wait to see the spin attempts now.
we already lmew there was top secret/SCI stuff there, we just got the first snapshot. the contents probably can't be publicized outside of the judge's chambers.
Can't wait to see the spin attempts now.
I'm betting someone will say there's mischief with the cover page.
They'll have to think of something quick. This is really bad.
Especially bad for this one:
no mystery there, the firehose of lies was never retired, it's still at the ready.
Yam s will claim that his black Sharpie was dry and that he could not write "Declassified by me, Yam s" on the cover sheet.
It simply comes down to whether you believe Hillary was or wasn't trying to hide anything. You blindly accept her word "they were all personal" and I have my doubts. The simplest way to have resolved it would have been to have given the FBI access to the computer before the bleachbit attack.
Some of Clinton's classified emails were found on Carlos Dangers laptop, so she shared classified data too. Again the quibble comes down to intent.
She even admitted after the fact that is what she should have done.
If you are talking about Paula Broadwell she had security clearance until it was revoked after the fact when she sent jealous threatening emails to Jill Kelly.
Maybe Trump should just come out and say it. He can’t read. He doesn’t know how to read.
That would help explain a lot actually, from his staff using pictures for his briefings to ripping and tearing up do ents Billy Madison style in frustration to how giddy and proud he was over his acute memory mastery of, “person, woman, man, camera, TV.” It certainly gives more believable reasoning for some of his mishandling of top secret/sci do ents than a lot of his other defense arguments. I mean, how can you know something is top secret/sci if you don’t know what that spells?
Isn’t ignorance of fact a legitimate defense in some situations?
There it is. That’s how he gets out of these legal troubles. He just ain’t smarter than a first grader.
"may not"
at least you conceded that.
Bottom line is she delivered the emails she wanted to deliver and destroyed the rest. I accept your blind trust in Clinton that there was nothing nefarious about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
