Gould never misses PATs. What a weird game.
yeah, Greenlaw led with the shoulder and not the head, the helmet to helmet was incidental contact and plus Herbert was a runner not a roughing the passer situation, so awful call.
Just another example of the jewish led NFL (@mark celibate can testify) being hypocrites in front of your very nose; on one side they paint "End Racism" by the goal post at every stadium, but on the same side of the coin they penalize and eject predominately-Black defensive players at disproportionate rates, to support their largely white elite quarterback consortium.
How anyone with a brain can't see this is lunacy, but it's also why the midterms did what they did... the USA is a largely bluepilled population that needs a nice big kick in the ass, by civil war or by nuke or by severe depression and a more competent nation like Russia taking our place for world dominance for at least some years.
Gould never misses PATs. What a weird game.
trying to even argue that's a touchback
Niners could legitimately run the table tbh. They won't due due to Crappolo but their toughest opponents left they play at home.
Imo,
@Cards (Mexico): W
Saints: W
Dolphins: Prolly L
Bucs: W (unless Brady isn't done)
@Seacucks: W (classic Niners lose here)
Commanders: W
At Raiders (shoutout to Raid): W
Cards: W
Last edited by Robz4000; 11-14-2022 at 02:19 AM.
Hey now
I like we but
split the Bucs/Hawks 2 games in 5 days
Cards twice and team we've struggled with probably drop 1
3-0 in division. Just need to keep our edge. League wise I'm not scared we are Road Warriors with Jimmy.
Juszczyk
Elijah
CMC
Deebo
Kittle
Ayiuk
Dream Team
As much sh!t as I’ve given Cuckott that one was on the defense and McBot tbh
Vikings-Bills catch controversy: NFL admits Gabe Davis' fourth-quarter grab would have been ruled incomplete
NFL Week 10 grades: Tom Brady's Buccaneers earn an 'A-' for win in Germany; Raiders get an 'F' for ugly loss (cbssports.com)
I'm shocked they didn't review it. Even live from the normal camera angle, I was pretty unsure if he caught it. Doesn't matter I guess, Bills lost anyway.
Still no reason to throw 46 times when your rbs are averaging over 5ypc
Edit - and up 14 to start the 4th
Are the Bills the new Bradys as far as pampering and ref riggin?
Now a true BradyRef would have sealed the deal and called the Vikings fumble recovery of Fingers Allen to be Bills ball thus end of game....
But still, BillsRef has come up with some doozeys this year.
Did you also notice how many times Bills dbs were able to do the full on pull on jersey and keep holding on for 5-6 seconds? Couple times the jersey came untucked and you could clearly see Bills defender coatailing. No calls.
Rewarded for the new stadium scam?
rofl yeah I’m not sure what this organization’s fetish is with abandoning the run when they have big leads against the Packers. They did the same thing in 2013 blowing that huge lead when The Bot went full Air Raid mode after Murray ran all
over them the 1st half
Here's yet another one.
Maybe we can get DeadlyDynasty to explain:
Bills had 12 men on field for crucial OT play vs. Vikings (espn.com)
You're very Pro Vikings brother. I noticed during the game. What's the story?
I'm always all about fairness.
Been noticing the Bills getting pref treatment for a while now.
Real generally speaking, the owners club likes to reward owners who really scam their local residents for a new funded stadium. Beyond that are they looking ahead to a replacement for Tampon Tom and have fallen on Josh Allen?
Why are you so ing weird. You never seem to want to have a normal discussion. It’s odd as .
Bills had 12 men on the field for the crucial stop on 4th and goal for the Vikings. It undoubtedly helped seal the line because you know, 12 is more then 11.
What the are you asking?
So the most shocking that happened in Week 10 was the Packers scoring 31 points in a game. I don't think anyone saw that one coming.
Eagles had a legit shot to perform a game winning drive too.
NFL corruption is sickening.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)