Reply With Quote
awwIt's not as easy to find written articles anymore because they all retracted or revised the headlines and articles
did you even watch the clip, instead of reading greenwald's tweet telling you what the clip says
"serious questions about..."
"looking into..."
these are your definite claims that suggest we can completely disregard the laptop story because muh experts letter said so?
awwIt's not as easy to find written articles anymore because they all retracted or revised the headlines and articles
TSA just amplified a Glenn Greenwald lie.
Huffpo ran a ing campaign ad for Biden
You missed a question.
Are you seriously claiming the MSM didn't use the letter to discredit, disregard, and bury the story to protect Biden before the election?
then i saw one about "spidey senses". i saw a still photo of brian seltzer saying that it is being "looked into"
quality over quanity, my friend. how about you find me just ONE example of MSM saying "look at this here letter, this means that we can disregard this laptop story as russian disinfo"
i'm seriously claiming you have failed to produce one good example. your claim, your burden.
but please, just take the time to vet ONE good example, and share the ONE good one. i dont want to deal with a wall of text or 30 tweets that i have to go through one by one only to be disappointed each time. you can do this by ACTUALLY watching the clip in question, or ACTUALLY reading the article in question, and not relying on a tweet purporting to summarize it for you
And you think that gives you a pass to again puss out and dodge my question? lol. Try again.
Are you seriously claiming the MSM didn't use the letter to discredit, disregard, and bury the story to protect Biden before the election?
And I haven't even gotten into the social media censorship.
It was all coordinated to protect Biden, and you look like a pathetic fool trying to claim otherwise. Oh wait...that's right...you keep dodging the question so you don't actually have to make a claim. Typical sr21
tbh i dont really remember what the msm said about the letter. but if your claim is that they used the letter to justify completely disregarding the entire story as disinfo i'm open to one strong, vetted example at least as a baseline (even though you are making it sound like literally every media company was doing so ad nauseum, im literally asking for 1 example)And you think that gives you a pass to again puss out and dodge my question? lol. Try again.
Are you seriously claiming the MSM didn't use the letter to discredit, disregard, and bury the story to protect Biden before the election?
And I haven't even gotten into the social media censorship.
It was all coordinated to protect Biden, and you look like a pathetic fool trying to claim otherwise. Oh wait...that's right...you keep dodging the question so you don't actually have to make a claim. Typical sr21
TSA and Darrin still can't say what specific thing on Hunter's laptop would've guaranteed four more years of Trump.
There's literally a montage of msm clips on page 1 of this thread.
Hey Darrin -- in your own words, what specific items on Hunter's laptop would've brought back your Trump?There's literally a montage of msm clips on page 1 of this thread.
there are a load of 2-3 second clips with little to no surrounding context, so no thanks. thats why i asked for a "good example" and quality over quan y.There's literally a montage of msm clips on page 1 of this thread.
They wanted a Hunter Biden sex tape but they're too embarrassed to admit it.
TSA posted links to Hunter Biden sex videos and he is definitely too embarrassed to admit it.They wanted a Hunter Biden sex tape but they're too embarrassed to admit it.
You need more context?
for a bunch of rapid fire clips that are almost exclusively no longer than 3 seconds?You need more context?
Gee, where did the narrative that Hunter laptop == Russian disinformation originate?
you tell me, darrin. ive been asking you to spoonfeed me for the last couple of pages now.
is it the letter?
i dont know exactly why, but it remains amusing to me just how reluctant people on this board are to just saying what they think
Oh I remember your sources on covid...
But it was more technical in nature.
What are your real go tos ?
Im not talking about some 5 page long treatise on Planet Pizza that no one reads.
I want sources you can actually understand and will help us all understand a situation more clearly.
go ahead.
Quite possibly the most ironic post I’ve ever read on this board.
Take your meds your getting incoherent again.
You paste in do ents that you have no idea what the subject applies to.
Cmon, help the board really understand your takes.
Im incoherent and Hillary Clinton eats baby parts...
ah yes, "philo", the guy notorious for never taking a position on things. and when somebody asks me for my position on something, i tell them. including in this thread. but if i dont have memory of something, i'm not going to lie or make things up.
i imagine what you are referencing is when you asked me if I thought the media tried brushing the biden story as purely disinfo and im honestly saying i dont really remember how the media at large dealt with it. i also dont have cable so i dont spend my days ingesting talk show content. vast majority of media i consume is printed media, which is usually significantly more measured than talking heads on TV opinion shows
but no, what im referring to is much more specific. like if you ask qris if he believes the earth is spherical like a globe, or whether he believes in the "snowglobe earth" model, he literally will refuse to tell you what he believes
That’s not what he said though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions