Reply With Quote
Spurs need to be in bottom 2 or 3. He better not mess this up lol
I literally did lol you just dont agree with it.
Spurs need to be in bottom 2 or 3. He better not mess this up lol
Not really that I saw...maybe I missed it though
^agreed lol
we are all waiting for you to post Deveonte Graham and Khem Birch hype tapes.
I actually like you…… be easy Kev���� On it boss!
Jak Trade: A
Josh Trade: D+ to C-
What do you give them
I'm a little higher than you... I agree with you on the Jak Trade, but give them a solid B on the Jrich trade.
I prefer us to send guys to places where we get the best value back. This is a basketball team, not a charity.
Lakers sent westbrook to utah even though he once had a fan thrown out and banned there for saying some racist to him. Pelinka didn't care.
This send me where I want to go has never done anything for the spurs. It doesn't get them free agents. It doesn't make players want to get traded here. All they are doing is taking less than what they could have possibly gotten somewhere else.
Just like the Dejounte trade. Sent him to Atlanta cause that is where he wanted to go. Then there was all the chatter about teams not even knowing that he was available.
Not the way you should be running a basketball team. It's like Pop wants to make sure players leave the spurs happy. In real life the second these players leave the spurs they don't think about the team or Pop every again.
Nah, given the market Josh trade was OK. And that's just the best kind of offers they got.
Didnt LA offer WB to SA preseason or early in season and SA passed? Have to ask “why” and “for what”?
So if J Rich gets hurt last night and can’t pass a physical, the Spurs get nothing. Why play him in a meaningless game?
That may be true but best offer doesn’t mean “good” right? Can be the best offer and still be a bad deal. If SA can flip Graham for something + next year? Then deal goes to B.
Because the deals you had lines up like this are ass and theres no downside if it falls through
But if he somehow drops a 40 piece maybe a team ups their offer.
B?????? B-serious bruh lol
JK - I will give it a B if it leads to something + off season/next season
And I dont have them equally weighted either. Jak deal being such a win makes it a B+ trade deadline even with the D+/C- grade on Josh deal.
Josh was UFA in 3 months. Something is better than nothing.
It was reported they tried to move him here without any 1st's...not sure what players they wanted, if any..
They wanted us to eat that bloated contract, and send back positive value players. No payment at all for the cap room.
No doubt Jak's deal is MUCH more important if you're weighting the deadline. I'm very pleased where we ate from a 'picks'standpoint..
Not so sure…thats right. But maybe timvp can shed some light there
timvp already covered most of the points I was going to make, but another solid move.
Graham isn't good and is overpaid, but is ironically a near perfect (small) for this team. He gives them someone who can actually dribble, a volume (if mediocre) three-point shooter and overall organizer to slot the young guards into roles more conducive to their development, while not being good enough to positively impact winning.
By this time next season, he might regain some value or be useful salary ballast in another trade (ditto for Birch).
While the picks are unlikely to have value in and of themselves, they create more optionality.
Not the only one remembering it that way.
Didnt say you were wrong - Trying to see if TIMVP has details
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
