In what way?
There isn't one. Khan is just corrupt.
not sure what you mean. maybe you just disagree with her.
You are okay with the government demanding Twitter to identify which journalists they gave access to?
Taibbi bragged about having access.
not sure, if Musk was using journalists to do something illegal or improper the FTC might have a good reason to ask. seems Twitter is the target here, I guess we'll see or we won't.
if journalists suffer reputational damage for carrying water for Elon Musk, so be it.
Twitter violated a 2011 consent order last year. According to that order, FTC has the power to demand information to find out if Twitter is complying with or violating the order.
Sounds like you're pissed at Lina Khan for simply doing her job. If Twitter gave personal user information covered by the order to third parties -- including journalists -- it's breaking the order.
What's your real beef, TSA?
Last edited by Winehole23; 03-08-2023 at 02:12 PM.
Elmo has exactly one remaining "reliability engineer" left
Are we just supposed to take the their word for it?
How is it improper for the FTC to enforce its consent order against Twitter? If Twitter is currently complying, cooperation should put Twitter in the clear. If not, actions have consequences.
Q Conspiracy Theorists are re s, by Matt Taibbi
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-trump-750486/
'The QAnon legend assigns every terrible thing in history to a blue-state plot. Liberals killed JFK Jr. to make way for the Clintons, shot Reagan, murdered Seth Rich, organized lots of kid-buggering operations (Pizzagate was just the tip of the iceberg), pulled off the Las Vegas massacre and allied themselves with an array of villains, from Julian Assange to JonBenet Ramsey’s killer. Into this mass rave of evil comes Donald Trump, a fat Christ sent down from right-winger heaven to clean the temples."
TSA pushed the items highlighted in red and definitely believed/believes Q is real.
![]()
TSA’s favorite journalist!
It's just not going to get better for him, is it?
I love dunking on Elon as much as anyone else, but let’s see some proof that this is for real.
But they didn't ask for the names of reporters "interacting with the company". What they asked is right there on the quoted text: "granted access to company records".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)